Finding Electric Field at 35.6 cm from Charge Distribution

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field at 35.6 cm from a spherical shell of radius 14.5 cm with a total charge of +38.9 microCoulombs, the correct formula is E = k_e * Q / r^2, where r is the distance from the center of the shell. The calculated electric field value of approximately 2,759,365.93 N/C was questioned for accuracy, as the homework website did not accept it. There was confusion regarding whether the distance should be measured from the shell's surface or its center. The discussion highlights the application of Gauss's Law, which states that a spherical shell can be treated as a point charge. The user plans to consult their professor for clarification on the problem.
notmetalenough
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with this problem:

Consider a thin spherical shell of radius 14.5 cm with a total charge of +38.9 microCloumbs distributed uniformly on its surface. (Take radially outward as the positive direction.)

So I need to find the field at 35.6cm from the center of the charge distribution.

Since this r is bigger than the shell R

E= k_e * Q/ r^2 ; right?

E = 8.99*10^9 * (38.9 * 10^-6)/(0.356)^2; right?

I get 2759365.9260194. My answer is MN/C so I put 2.76

No dice. Did I miss something?

I also tried 0.276, 27.6, 276, 2760, 27600, 276000, and 2760000 to be sure that the program wasn't just disregarding which units it wanted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
according to Guass' Law, a spherical shell as a whole should be treated as a point charge. What is the distnace from the shell (as a whole) to the point where you want to evaluate the electric field?
 
try 2759365.926 or 2 759 000 again as far as I can see you have calculated it correctly. Are you sure the numbers are right.

might the question really say that the point is 35.6 beyond the shell?
 
Last edited:
stunner5000pt said:
according to Guass' Law, a spherical shell as a whole should be treated as a point charge. What is the distnace from the shell (as a whole) to the point where you want to evaluate the electric field?


I was under the impression that Gauss's Law said that the spherical shell is treated as a point charge at the center of the shell itself. But I tried all numbers of different radii, none of them would give the right answer (according to the homework website). I think I'll just address this with my professor directly.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top