Finding electric potential with non-uniform charge density?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential of a spherical shell with a non-uniform charge density, σ=k*sinθ. Participants debate the integration method for finding the potential both inside and outside the shell, noting that the electric field inside should be zero due to Gauss's law, as all charge resides on the surface. The need for proper integral boundaries is emphasized, with references to using Green's functions and Legendre polynomials for solutions. There is clarification that the problem does not specify a metallic shell, which affects the behavior of the electric field. The conversation suggests moving the problem to a homework forum for more structured assistance.
solijoli
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
We have a spherical shell. We want to find the electric potential everywhere. Given charge density σ=k*sinθ, k is constant. Also it is wanted from direct integration. V=1/4piε ∫σ/r da. How can we do this, please help?
I thought because it is sphere da is in the direction of r so da=r^2sinθ dθ d(phi) in spherical coordinates but I couldn't solve it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have tried ∫sin² x dx = ½ x − ¼ sin 2x + C?
 
My question is what would be the integral boundaries for Vinside and Voutside. When you just integrate sin^2x dx you just get one result. How can you write for inside and for outside?
 
The electric filed is zero. Gauss theorem. The volume inside does not have a charge. You cannot have a closed surface with a charge inside, ∇ρ=0, because all the charges are distributed on the surface. That's the reason why the electric field inside a metal is zero. But the potential is cte or zero. It is the same from the physical point of view
 
There is an expansion of the Green's function in terms of Legendre polynomials. You could use that. If that doen't work, then you could use the expansion of the Green's function in terms of spherical harmonics. Refer chapter 3 of Jackson, 3rd edition, in particular, section 3.3 .
Since this problem has azimuthal symmetry, you may also want to have a look at equation 3.33 in Jackson and apply the boundary conditions that the potential is zero at infinity and should be finite at zero.
@ cabrera:
woudn't agree with you as:
1) Nothing mentioned in the problem specifies that it is a metal.
2) Charge density does not have spherical symmetry.
 
Last edited:
physwizard, I meant inside the shell. The field should zero,shouldn't it?
 
cabrera said:
physwizard, I meant inside the shell. The field should zero,shouldn't it?

no, not with a non-conducting shell. The charges don't move around on a non-conductor.

Suggest that we move this to the homework forum and follow the rules there?
 
If the charge density was uniform, wouldn't the potential inside be equal to the potential of the surface? V=1/4pi epsilon * Q/R . But in this case the charge density is not uniform. Also it is a conducting shell so i think the electric field inside should be zero because of gauss law, there is no q enclosed since all the q is on surface then field=0
 
Back
Top