Finding energy as a function of Symplectic area?

BiotFartLaw
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the energy E of the harmonic oscillator (H(x,p)=p2/2m+mω2x2) as a function of the system's symplectic area.



Homework Equations


Canonical equations and A=\int p dx (over one period)


The Attempt at a Solution


From Hamilton's equations I get :

\dot{x}=\partial H/ \partial p and \dot{p}=- \partial H/ \partial x

So

dot{x}=p/m and \dot{p}=-2m\omega<sup>2</sup>x

x(t)=pt/m ; p(t)=-2m \omega <sup>2</sup>xt

Then I integrate

\int pdx = \int p d(pt/m)

But I'm not sure how to handle the d(pt/m) term. If I do chain rule (in time) I get something like

d(pt/m)=1/m (p+\dot{p}))dt

and I'm not really sure what the answer is if I do it in x. Since I don't know what dp/dx is. (other than m*dv/dx=m*dx'/dx ... but I'm not sure what good that does me).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the shape of the orbit (for a given energy E) on a p vs x plot. There is a simple geometric formula for the area enclosed in the orbit,##\int{pdx}##.

[EDIT: Or, if you really want to carry out the integration, use E = p2/2m + (1/2)2x2 to find p as a function of x for fixed E.]
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top