Finding Forces Exerted at A and B on Rod AB

  • Thread starter Thread starter roldy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Rod
roldy
Messages
206
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The 2 kg rod AB and the 3kg rod BC are connected as shown to a disk that is made to rotate in a vertical plane at a constant angular velocity of 6 rad/s clockwise. For the position shown, determine the forces exerted at A and B on rod AB.


Homework Equations


summation of forces
mass moment of inertia
relative velocites and accelerations


The Attempt at a Solution


I think I solved the accelerations and angular accelerations correctly but at this point I'm unclear as to what to do next.
http://img217.imageshack.us/my.php?image=130oc0.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good so far!

You accidentally set the wrong component to zero in the line for a_A, but you fixed it in the next line. Make sure you correct that line too!

Now that you have a_A and a_B, throw away everything except rod AB. You can now describe the dynamics of rod AB in terms of a center of mass acceleration (=(a_A+a_B)/2) and an angular acceleration about the center (=(a_A-a_B)/L). This can be seen as coming from a pure force (acting at the center) and a pure couple (torque about the center). From here, finding the forces at A and B is just a matter of adding and subtracting.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top