Finding friction on a onedimensional tube

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShizukaSm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Tube
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the friction coefficient (\(\mu_e\)) between a bar and two equal surfaces in a physics problem. The user initially calculated \(\mu_e\) as 0.569345 or -1.75641, while the book provided values of 0.225979 or 4.42518. The discrepancy arises from the incorrect assumption of the direction of the friction force, which must always oppose the relative motion of the surfaces. Correctly identifying the direction of forces is crucial for accurate calculations in static equilibrium problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of friction coefficients and their significance
  • Ability to analyze forces and torques in a system
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of static friction and its role in equilibrium problems
  • Learn how to apply Newton's laws to solve for unknown forces
  • Explore the effects of varying angles on friction in inclined planes
  • Investigate the relationship between normal force and friction in different scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers dealing with mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of friction and equilibrium in physical systems.

ShizukaSm
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
PRobStatem.JPG

Find the friction coefficient between the bar and the surfaces. Both surfaces are equal (and thus have equal coefficients).

Ok so, my problem is that, generally in physics when I assume an wrong direction for a vector, I will be able to discover that in my answer (generally speaking the vector will be negative), however, in this question assuming a wrong direction will give me a completely wrong answer and I don't understand why this happens or how to define the right orientation right from the start.

My original trial:
MySolution.JPG

\\\sum F_x = 0 \rightarrow N_a\mu_e + Nb\left(-\mu_e \cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta) \right ) = 0<br /> \\\sum F_y = 0 \rightarrow N_a + N_b(\cos(\theta)-\mu_e \sin(\theta)) = W<br /> \\\sum \tau_A = 0 \rightarrow W = \frac{N_b}{\sin(\theta)}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> \mu_e = 0.569345 \text{ or } \mu_e = -1.75641


Book (I suppose it's also the correct one):
BookSolution.jpg

\\\sum F_x = 0 \rightarrow N_a\mu_e + Nb\left(+^{[1]}\mu_e \cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta) \right ) = 0<br /> \\\sum F_y = 0 \rightarrow N_a + N_b(\cos(\theta)+^{[2]}\mu_e \sin(\theta)) = W<br /> \\\sum \tau_A = 0 \rightarrow W = \frac{N_b}{\sin(\theta)}<br /> \\\text{Only differences in [1] and [2].}<br /> \\<br /> \mu_e = 0.225979 \text{ or } \mu_e = 4.42518
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem arises when you select whether FB is + or - NBμecos(θ). As soon as you choose which, you have specified which way that force acts in relation to FA.
You can determine the direction easily from first principles. Friction always acts to oppose relative motion of the surfaces in contact. If it acts downwards at the top of the rod that must be because, in the absence of friction, the rod would slide upwards. But since the rod is of fixed length, that would mean the base of the rod would slide towards the vertical face. To get a valid alternative solution you must reverse both friction directions. I would guess that will then give you the correct solution but with the coefficient negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K