Finding J=0 Momentum States in Spin 1/2 Particle System

  • Thread starter Thread starter CrusaderSean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Qm
CrusaderSean
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I have a general question on finding momentum states

Let's say I have two spin 1/2 particles, so
J=S_1+S_2
and |J| ranges from |S_1 + S_2| to |S_1 - S_2|
in this case J=1 is triplet and J=0 is singlet.

Now how do you find the J=0 state? I know that
|j=0,m_j=0>=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\uparrow_1 \downarrow_2 - \downarrow_1 \uparrow_2)
but how do you get this in the first place? Is it pretty much trial and error and then use operator to generate rest of the states for that particular J? Or is there an algorithm for finding state |j,m_j=j>?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it's all about reading & understanding Clebsch-Gordan theorem & coefficients correctly. Technically

|j,m\rangle =\sum_{m_{1},m_{2}} \langle j_{1},m_{1},j_{2},m_{2}|j,m\rangle |j_{1},m_{1},j_{2},m_{2} \rangle

The coefficients are tabulated, also, you know that j=0 and m=0.

Daniel.
 
If you don't have a CG table, you can generate the spin estates.
First form J_11=\up\up. Then use the lowering operator to form the three J=1 states. J_00 will be orthogonal to J_10.
 
I see. We never really went over CG table so I had to guess the first form and generate rest of the spin (or orbital angular momentum) states. Thanks for the clarification.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top