Finding Kinetic Energy From A Graph

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the kinetic energy of a lunchbox sliding on a frictionless surface under the influence of wind, using a position vs. time graph. Participants are tasked with estimating kinetic energy at specific times and calculating work done by the wind force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding the slope of the graph to determine velocity and subsequently kinetic energy. Some express uncertainty about their calculations and the method of estimating slopes at specific points.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the correct method for calculating slopes and kinetic energy. Some participants have shared their calculations, while others question the validity of these approaches and suggest refining estimates for better accuracy.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem statement and are encouraged to clarify their methods and assumptions. There is a focus on understanding the graphical representation of motion and its implications for kinetic energy calculations.

danest
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.0 kg lunchbox is sent sliding over a frictionless surface, in the positive direction of an x-axis along the surface. Beginning at time t = 0, a steady wind pushes on the lunchbox in the negative direction of the x axis. Figure 7-50 shows the position x of the lunchbox as a function of time t as the wind pushes on the lunchbox. From the graph, estimate the kinetic energy of the lunchbox at (a)t = 1.0 s and (b)t = 5.0 s. (c) How much work does the force from the wind do on the lunchbox from t = 1.0 s to t = 5.0 s?
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c07/fig07_50.gifFig. 7-50

Homework Equations


Change in Y/ Change X

K = .5mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried finding the slope for each part bc that would be the velocity and then I plug in the velocity into the K equation but it did not work. I am not sure what else to try after that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is correct. Show us exactly what you did and how you put numbers in the equations. We can't pinpoint what didn't work without knowing what you did.
 
For part a) I used the the coordinate (0,0) and (1,1) to get the slope and it was just 1
Then I plug it into K = (1/2)(2)(1^2) = 1

For part b ) I used the coordinates (0,0) and (5,2.5) and found the slope for that to be (1/2)
then K = (1/2)(2)(1/2^2) = .25

I think for part 3 you have to subtract the first two answers to get the total but I can't get those yet
 
danest said:
For part a) I used the the coordinate (0,0) and (1,1) to get the slope and it was just 1
Then I plug it into K = (1/2)(2)(1^2) = 1
That's about right.

For part b ) I used the coordinates (0,0) and (5,2.5) and found the slope for that to be (1/2)
You can't do that. The slope is a line tangent to the graph at the appropriate point. At 5.0 s, the line tangent to the graph is parallel to the time axis. What is the slope at t = 5.0 s?
 
The slope would just be 0 then.

I also tried the answer for a and it was wrong. Is there something I missed there?
 
danest said:
The slope would just be 0 then.

I also tried the answer for a and it was wrong. Is there something I missed there?

Not really, but you may wish to refine the estimate for the velocity. Read the position at 0.5 s and at 1.5 s, take the difference and divide by (1.5 - 0.5) s. You should get a better value that way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K