Finding Laurent Series for f(z)=z^2/(z+1) at z=-1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the Laurent series for the function f(z) = z²/(z+1) around the point z = -1. The user struggles with the procedure, particularly in determining the type of singularity and the residue at z = -1. It is established that the function has a simple pole at z = -1, and the correct approach involves starting with the Taylor series for z² at -1, followed by dividing by (z+1) to obtain the Laurent expansion. The integral method for finding Laurent series is noted as complex and often unnecessary when simpler methods are available.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laurent series and their definitions
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, particularly singularities
  • Proficiency in performing complex integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Taylor series for functions around specific points
  • Learn about identifying and classifying singularities in complex functions
  • Explore the relationship between Laurent series and residues
  • Investigate simpler methods for finding Laurent series, such as series manipulation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as anyone seeking to understand the intricacies of Laurent series and their applications in evaluating singularities and residues.

Hertz
Messages
180
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Specifically, I'm trying to find the laurent series for f(z)=\frac{z^2}{z+1} around the point z=-1. My real problem is my procedure in general though. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong on a lot of these Laurent Series but for some reason I'm struggling with them.

(Even more specifically, I'm trying to find the type of singularity and the residue at z=-1.)

Homework Equations



\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}{c_n (z-z_0)^n} where
c_n=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{C}{\frac{f(z)dz}{(z-z_0)^{n+1}}}

The Attempt at a Solution



What I did is take the z^2 out and set z_0=-1 because that's the point I want to expand around. Then I set C such that z=-1+e^{i\theta} where -\pi < \theta < \pi and integrated.

I found the integral, which was \frac{sin(n+1)\pi}{(n+1)\pi} which equals zero for all values of n besides n=-1.

I could probably find out more about the coefficient at -1 if I evaluated the integral for n=-1, but at this point I realized I still had the x^2 in there that would throw off the degree of my Laurent Series anyways...

So I basically feel like I have spent way more time on this problem than I should have and have almost no results to show for it. Clearly, my procedure is not spot on :\. Can anybody help me out? How should I start out on a problem like this?

Normally, when I try to find a Laurent Series, this is what I do:
1. Decide where it should be centered.
2. Think about other series representations that I've memorized to maybe do a quick easy substitution or break up the function into multiple parts.
3. If I have no success this far, I'll usually just result to the laurent series formula that I have posted above, but clearly, I'm running into problems with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a simple pole at z = -1. That means you will have one negative exponent in your Laurent expansion. Start with the Taylor's series for ##z^2## at the point -1 (i.e. you are expanding in powers of z+1. You will get

##z^2 = \sum [stuff]##. This series converges throughout the complex plane. Now divide it by z+1 to get

##z^2 = \sum [stuff]/(z+1) ##. This gives you the entire Laurent expansion.

In general finding Laurent expansions via the integral is a fraught process. Sometimes it's the only way, but if you can think of something simpler, use it. The Laurent series is unique, so if you have a series that converges to your function in a domain around a singularity, it has to be the Laurent series. (If there is no singularity it has to be the Taylor's series).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K