Finding Literature Heat Capacity Values

AI Thread Summary
Heat capacity values for CO2, CH4, C3H8, HCl, Al, Ag, and Ti are being sought. Users are encouraged to search online using specific terms like "heat capacity CO2" for quick results. The discussion includes a formula for calculating heat capacity, which involves degrees of freedom and constant volume heat capacity. The equation emphasizes the relationship between pressure, volume change, and temperature change. Accurate heat capacity data is essential for various scientific applications.
thisbmagic32
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I need to find the heat capacities of
CO2 (g), CH4 (g), C3H8 (g) , HCl (g)
Al (s) , Ag (s) , Ti (s)

if anyone can post a link or let me know what the heat capacities of these substances are I'd greatly appreciate it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Search the internet for "heat capacity CO2", or some other variation.
 
You can use the equation for heat capacity :

C=\frac{P}{n} \frac{dv}{dt} +C_v
where f is the degrees of freedom of each gas and C_v is the heat capacity at constant volume and \frac{P}{n} \frac{dv}{dt} depends on the process it goes through.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top