Finding magnitude of electric field at center of square

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the center of a square formed by charges at its corners. Participants clarify that while the electric potential can be determined easily, the electric field requires understanding vector directions. The electric fields from each charge can be computed using the formula E = kq/r², and the total electric field can be found by applying the Pythagorean theorem due to the right angles formed by the fields. It is emphasized that the direction of the electric field is determined by the nature of the charges, with positive charges repelling and negative charges attracting. The conclusion is that visualizing the charge arrangement can simplify the ranking of electric potential and field magnitudes without complex vector analysis.
s-f
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
In each situation below, electric charges are arranged at the corner of a square. Each charge Q has the same magnitude with the signs indicated in the diagrams. Rank the electric potential from most positive to most negative, and the magnitude of the electric field at the center of the square.

So basically there are 10 squares; each has a charge in each corner. I know how to calculate the electric potential of each square, but not the electric field. I know this involves vectors which is something I don't know anything about (not sure what i hat or j hat mean). For example, here is 1 square:

(+)(+)
( -)( -)

2 positive charges on top, 2 negative ones on bottom. The Voltage/electric potential is clearly 0. How is the magnitude of the electric field calculated?

E = kq/r2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can actually solve this square without using vectors, just some geometry.

You have four electric fields (one for each charge). Two of them point to the lower right corner and the other two point to the lower left corner. All of this fields can be easily computed using the formula you gave.

Now the thing is, once you have the field produced by each charge, how do you get the total field. THe thing to notice here is that the fields form a 90º angle between them, so you have an square triangle. You can just use pythagoras theorem to get the total field.
 
How do you know that 2 point to the lower right corner and that 2 point to the low left?
 
Well, the electric field always points in the direction positive charges would move under its action.

So te two positive charges should move a positive charge away from them, and the two negative ones should move it towards them. Think of it a little, watch the drawing and its pretty clear that two point to the loewr right and the other two to the lower left.
 
Ok I think I get it - you don't need vectors or even geometry really, since they're simply asking to rank by magnitude - I just drew arrows for each charge and compared each box visually to get the answers. Thanks for your explanation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top