Finding Maximum Thrust: Flow Rate, Velocity, Area & Pressure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating maximum thrust in rocket propulsion, focusing on the relationships between flow rate, exit velocity, nozzle area, and pressure. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of thrust generation, including combustion temperature, fuel burn rates, and the dynamics of exhaust flow.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the challenge of finding equations relating flow rate, pressure, area, and exit velocity, emphasizing that thrust is linked to mass and acceleration, but questions how to define acceleration at the nozzle.
  • Another participant suggests that increasing combustion temperature is an efficient way to enhance thrust at a given flow rate.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the importance of momentum rate, stating that thrust can be derived from mass flow rate and exit velocity, with additional thrust possible from pressure thrust at the nozzle exit.
  • One participant proposes that increasing the burn rate of fuel can be an alternative to decreasing nozzle size for thrust enhancement, while also noting that higher velocity leads to greater engine efficiency.
  • Concerns are raised about maintaining high pressure in fuel lines relative to the combustion chamber, with a participant questioning the flow dynamics based on pressure differences.
  • Another participant confirms the importance of turbopumps in maintaining fuel flow against pressure differentials in rocket engines.
  • One participant shares links to external resources that provide theoretical calculations for exhaust velocity and thrust, while discussing historical approaches to rocket design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanisms of thrust generation and the relationships between different parameters. There is no consensus on a single approach or formula, and multiple competing ideas remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of the relationships between flow rate, pressure, and thrust, indicating that assumptions about fuel properties and nozzle design can significantly affect calculations. The discussion also touches on historical methods and technological advancements in rocket propulsion.

GiTS
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
I've been thinking about how to calculate how to find maximum thrust. But I can't find any equations for flow rate and pressure and area. I know that thrust is a force and force is mass x acceleration. But I don't know how id get an acceleration. There's an exit velocity at the nozzle of the rocket but there's no acceleration. The acceleration stops at the nozzle.
I also know that the higher the exit velocity, the higher the thrust. And the way to increase exit velocity is to increase the pressure and the way to increase the pressure is to decrease the nozzle cross-sectional area. But decreasing the nozzle cross sectional area decreases the volumetric flowrate thereby decreasing the mass flow rate which decreases the mass part of the force equation and the thrust. I need equations relating flow rate, flow velocity, area, and pressure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not in a position to offer you any formulae right now, but keep in mind that the most effecient way to increase your thrust at a given flow rate is to increase the combustion temperature.
 
You need to look at it in terms of momentum rate. You have your mass flow rate and you have the exit velocity. That will give you the main component of thrust. There can be additional thrust if the nozzle allows for the proper expansion. In that case you then have a pressure thrust acting over the area of the exit plane of the nozzle and the two components are added.

Here's a pretty good link:
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/rktthsum.html
 
The alternative to decreasing nozzle size is to increase the burn rate of the fuel. Although the thrust is directly related to mass x acceleration, a close enough approximation can be made by just using the velocity of the expelled matter.

The main fact about higher velocity, is that the higher the velocity, the more efficient the engine, more thrust for the same amount of fuel.

Also the acceleration continues past the nozzle, as the exhausted gas continues to expand, especially in space.

Flow rate versus pressure would depend on the fuel, it's surface friction and viscousity.
 
to keep the high pressure exhaust from stopping fuel flow, the fuel lines would have to have a small area, smaller than the nozzle are.

but I'm doubting my previous logic. because if the pressure in the fuel tank was less than the pressure in the combustion chamber, the fuel would not flow into the combustion chamber because movement is alwys in the direction from high pressure to low pressure. or am i wrong?
 
GiTS said:
because if the pressure in the fuel tank was less than the pressure in the combustion chamber, the fuel would not flow into the combustion chamber because movement is alwys in the direction from high pressure to low pressure. or am i wrong?
No. You are correct. That is why there are huge turbopumps (boost pumps) in between to create that flow. Take a look at what the space shuttle's main engines use for that: http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/propul/SSME.html

Just as an aside, I like looking at this page every once in a while:
http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/propul/SSMEamaz.html

Notice the subsection in the table on pump output pressures.

Again, you need to look at the momentum rate out the back of the engine. That is not the same as saying f=ma which assumes a constant mass. If you look at Astro's (under Ideal rocket equation) or my link above, you will see that every term in the main equation, including the statement of Newton's 3rd law, is in terms of change of momentum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
GiTS said:
I've been thinking about how to calculate how to find maximum thrust. But I can't find any equations for flow rate and pressure and area. I know that thrust is a force and force is mass x acceleration. But I don't know how id get an acceleration. There's an exit velocity at the nozzle of the rocket but there's no acceleration. The acceleration stops at the nozzle.
I also know that the higher the exit velocity, the higher the thrust. And the way to increase exit velocity is to increase the pressure and the way to increase the pressure is to decrease the nozzle cross-sectional area. But decreasing the nozzle cross sectional area decreases the volumetric flowrate thereby decreasing the mass flow rate which decreases the mass part of the force equation and the thrust. I need equations relating flow rate, flow velocity, area, and pressure.

You might take a look at

http://members.aol.com/ricnakk/th_nozz.html

Given the temperature and pressure in the combustion chamber, and the exit pressure at the nozzle (the atmospheric pressure), this allows you to calculate the theoretical exhaust velocity for an idealized nozzle and an idealized exhaust.

The next web (click next) or see
http://members.aol.com/ricnakk/th_thrst.html

calculates thrust, but you'll need the info on the first webpage to interpret the results.

Note that as other posters have remarked, you DO need powerful (but light!) turbopumps to make continuous flow liqiud fuel rockets work - that's why it's "rocket science" :biggrin:

The earliest designs, like the V2 pulse rocket, avoided this by having the combusion occur in spurts, with valves in the fuel line to allow for pulsed operaation. Fuel was fed into the chamber only when combustion was not occurring and the pressure was low.

The pulsed approach leads to a lot of mechanical and other problems, though, so the turbopump approach replaced the pulse rockets when the technology was developed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K