Finding net force on a charge (direction help)

shortman12012
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a region of two-dimensional space, there are three fixed charges: +1 mC at (0, 0), −2 mC at (12 mm, -7 mm), and +3 mC at (-6 mm, 18 mm). What is the net force on the −2-mC charge?
magnitude
direction ° counterclockwise from the +x-axis


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So to solve I translated the axes so the origin would be at the -2 mC charge.

1 mC at (-12,7), 3 mC at (-18,25)

E = kq1q2/r2 is a vector along the line joining the two charges.

For the first charge, E =

(8.99 * 109 Nm2/C2)(1 * 10-3 C)(2 * 10-3 C)/((12 * 10-3 m)2 + (7 * 10-3 m)2) = 9.31 * 107 N/C; in vector form given the signs of the charge and the location, E = -8.04 * 107i + 4.69 * 107j N/C

For the second charge, E =

(8.99 * 109 Nm2/C2)(3 * 10-3 C)(2 * 10-3 C)/((18 * 10-3 m)2 + (25 * 10-3 m)2) = 5.68 * 107 N/C; in vector form given the signs of the charge and the location, E = -3.32 * 107i + 4.61 * 107j N/C

Combining components, Etotal = -1.137 * 108i + 9.30 * 107j N/C

magnitude = 1.469 * 108 N/C

direction = 140.7°

My problem is the direction, I check my work and did it again but when I enter it into my homework it says it's wrong. Am I misunderstanding the counterclockwise from the +x-axis or can someone help me out please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haven't you forgotten the sign of the -2nC charge?

ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top