Finding New Rate of Rotation for a Student on a Rotating Platform with Dumbbells

  • Thread starter Thread starter chess10771
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rate Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the new rate of rotation for a student on a rotating platform after he pulls dumbbells closer to his body. Initially, the system rotates at 0.95 rev/s with a rotational inertia of 7.40 kg·m². When the student pulls the dumbbells in from 65 cm to 22 cm, the change in rotational inertia must be considered to find the new rate of rotation. The problem involves applying the conservation of angular momentum, which states that the initial angular momentum equals the final angular momentum. The conversation emphasizes the need to reference physics principles and equations related to rotational motion for a solution.
chess10771
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A student stands on a platform that is free to rotate and holds two dumbbells, each at a distance of 65 cm from his central axis. Another student gives him a push and starts the system of student, dumbbells, and platform rotating at 0.95 rev/s. The student on the platform then pulls the dumbbells in close to his chest so that they are each 22 cm from his central axis. Each dumbbell has a mass of 5.00 kg and the rotational inertia of the student, platform, and dumbbells is initially 7.40 kg · m2. Model each arm as a uniform rod of mass 3.00 kg with one end at the central axis; the length of the arm is initially 65 cm and then is reduced to 22 cm. What is his new rate of rotation?


Homework Equations


Newtons 2nd law?


The Attempt at a Solution


Not really sure how to go about solving, Please show all work if possible, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd guess you're in a freshman physics class this semester, probably about Chapter 8, +/- 1 Chapter. So, what are you studying that looks anything like this? Skim through the text and look for a picture or diagram that suggests anything close to this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top