Finding planks constant from photoelectric effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an experiment measuring the photoelectric effect by shining different colors of light on a cathode and recording the average stopping potential. The participant seeks clarification on whether the line of best fit for their graph of average stopping potential versus frequency should pass through the origin. They reference the equation eV = hf, questioning the intercept and the behavior of photocurrent at varying potentials. Responses suggest that the participant should plot the theoretical curve to determine if it intersects at (0,0) and indicate that their initial equation may need revision. Understanding the relationship between stopping potential and frequency is crucial for accurately determining Planck's constant.
hayyan1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, i was doing an experiment in which you shine different colours of light onto a cathode and apply negative voltage to the anode so that the photo current reduced to a constant value.
I obtained the average stopping potential for each wavelength of light (green yellow blue violet turquoise) and now i was going to plot average stopping potential versus frequency. Now the gradient of this graph multiplied by the charge of the electron gives me Plancks constant (h=e(ΔV/Δf)).
However my problem is, does the line of best fit go through the origin or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the equation that describes the photoelectric effect? Why does the slope give you Planck's constant?
 
i have the equation
e(electron charge) x V(stopping potential)= h(plancks constant) x f(frequency)
 
Well, if that is the equation, you should know what the intercept on the axis is!

How do you derive that equation?
 
huh? all I am saying is that i plotted average stopping potential on y-axis and frequency on x-axis, and all i want to know is that would my line of best fit go through (0,0) or not.
 
Does the photocurrent drop to zero when a potential across it is equal to the kinetic energy of electrons?, because i found this not to be the case, the photocurrent reached a steady value that didnt decrease further, as i increased the potential across the anode and cathode..
 
hayyan1 said:
huh? all I am saying is that i plotted average stopping potential on y-axis and frequency on x-axis, and all i want to know is that would my line of best fit go through (0,0) or not.

Yes, and I'm saying you should be able to work this out from the equation for the photoelectric effect. So please plot the theoretical stopping potential vs. frequency curve, and see if it goes through (0,0).

Hint: Your equation is not quite correct.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top