Finding pressure in a branch with known flows

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nevonis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Branch Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on equations governing flow and pressure in a pipe system, specifically in a closed loop with three branches. The user describes a chilled water loop with varying pressures in each branch and questions the accuracy of flow measurements taken after pressure regulators. They suspect that back pressure may be causing inaccuracies in flow meter readings, as the flow into the loop should equal the flow out. Another participant suggests considering Bernoulli's equation for analyzing pressure in the branches, especially if the flow is incompressible. The conversation highlights the complexities of measuring flow and pressure in multi-branch systems and the need for accurate modeling to understand these dynamics.
Nevonis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey!

So we have these equations that describe flow through and pressure in a pipe.
∂p/∂t = -β/A * ∂q/∂x​
∂q/∂t = -A/ρ * ∂p/∂x - F/ρ + g*Acos(α(x))​
where A = cross area, β = bulk constant for water, p = pressure, q = flow, ρ = density, g = gravity constant, F = forces due to friction, α = angle between gravity and direction of flow

Discretized, we get this (simplefied, linearized with linear friction)
∂pi/∂t = β/(A*l) * (qi-1-qi)​
∂qi/∂t = A/(l*ρ) * (pi - pi+1) - fqi
Where, f = friction constant.
So, basically, for pressure at a certain point (i), we have that
∂pi/∂t = C * (qin-qout)​

I'm wondering if there are any similar equations that describes the pressure at a branch with known flow in and flow out (through both branches).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry Nevonis, I am unable to help with your question.

However, I came to the forum looking for clues to a problem I am having in a closed loop system with 3 branches, perhaps you or someone else would have an answer...

I have a chilled water loop that travels up into the ceiling 18', diagonally 60', then back down into another room 18'. The line is then divided into 3 branches that I adjust the pressure of to control my flow (9PSI, 10PSI, and 3PSI). The three lines then travel through the tool being cooled and back in three pipes to the room where the chiller is located, about 100' away.

The three lines then recombine after going through a flow meter. The flow meters indicate that each line is very close to one another in flow (~14 GPH).

My question is:
Can the ~14GPH be assumed to be an inaccurate measurement of what the flows are immediately after the pressure regulators, before entering my equipment?
 
I don't see how you could not. Flow into the loop = flow out of the loop. The pressure just decides what the different flows are in each branch.
 
My thinking was at the end of the three lines where they recombine, right after the 3 0-60GPH float flow meters there was a back pressure that was causing the readings to be incorrect.
 
Hmm, I wouldn't know.. Sorry
 
Nevonis said:
Hey!

So we have these equations that describe flow through and pressure in a pipe.
∂p/∂t = -β/A * ∂q/∂x​
∂q/∂t = -A/ρ * ∂p/∂x - F/ρ + g*Acos(α(x))​
where A = cross area, β = bulk constant for water, p = pressure, q = flow, ρ = density, g = gravity constant, F = forces due to friction, α = angle between gravity and direction of flow

Discretized, we get this (simplefied, linearized with linear friction)
∂pi/∂t = β/(A*l) * (qi-1-qi)​
∂qi/∂t = A/(l*ρ) * (pi - pi+1) - fqi
Where, f = friction constant.
So, basically, for pressure at a certain point (i), we have that
∂pi/∂t = C * (qin-qout)​

I'm wondering if there are any similar equations that describes the pressure at a branch with known flow in and flow out (through both branches).

What about Bernulli's equation? If your flow is incompressible you can apply it between any arbitrary points if the flow is also irrotational or between points on the same streamline if the flow is rotational.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top