Finding ##R_1## & ##R_2## in Series Circuit

AI Thread Summary
In a series circuit with resistances ##R_1## and ##R_2## connected to a 12 V battery, the current increases by 0.2 A when ##R_2## is removed and by 0.1 A when ##R_1## is removed. Using Ohm's law, the equations derived lead to the values of ##R_1## and ##R_2## being calculated as approximately 35 Ω and 50 Ω, respectively. An error was identified in the initial calculations, particularly in the formulation of the relationship between the resistances. The quadratic equation produced two potential values for ##R_1##, but only the one yielding a positive ##R_2## was valid, leading to the conclusion that ##R_1=35.15Ω## and ##R_2=50Ω## are the correct answers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying solutions to avoid extraneous roots in calculations.
kaspis245
Messages
189
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two resistances, ##R_1## and ##R_2##, are connected in series across a 12 V battery. The current increases by 0.2 A when ##R_2## is removed, leaving ##R_1## connected across the battery. However, the current increases by just 0.1 A when ##R_1## is removed, leaving ##R_2## connected across the battery. Find ##R_1## and ##R_2##.

Homework Equations


Ohm's law.

The Attempt at a Solution


##ΔI_1=0.2 A##
##ΔI_2=0.1 A##(1) ##I=\frac{V}{R_1}-ΔI_1##

(2) ##I=\frac{V}{R_2}-ΔI_2##

(3) ##I=\frac{V}{R_1+R_2}##

From (1) and (2):
(4) ##R_2=\frac{120R_1}{R_1+120}##

From (2) and (3):
(5) ##\frac{V}{R_2}-ΔI_2=\frac{V}{R_1+R_2}##

Then I put (4) into (5) and get:
##R_1=0.503Ω##
##R_2=0.5009Ω##

The correct answer is ##R_1=35Ω##, ##R_2=50Ω##.

I fail to spot my mistake. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Recheck eq. 4
 
I see, it's suppose to be ##R_2=-\frac{120R_1}{R_1-120}##, but then I get two ##R_1## values:
##R_1=35.15##
##R_1=204.85##
Both seem correct. How come the authors chose only one of them?
 
kaspis245 said:
I see, it's suppose to be ##R_2=-\frac{120R_1}{R_1-120}##, but then I get two ##R_1## values:
##R_1=35.15##
##R_1=204.85##
Both seem correct. How come the authors chose only one of them?
Calculate the value of ##R_2## associated with each choice of ##R_1##.
 
In solving a quadratic eq you sometimes get extraneous roots. You must determine if it is a plausible soution. the 204.85 ohm solution does not satisfy eq 4 predicting a neg value for R2. So discard it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top