Finding Radial Force from Free Body Diagram

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the calculation of radial force from a free body diagram. The radial force (Fr) is determined to be equal to the horizontal component of the normal force (Fn), while the vertical forces balance equation incorporates the friction force (Ff) and the weight (Fz). The professor specified that the final expression for Fr must include the coefficient of friction (mu) and exclude squared trigonometric functions. There was initial confusion about whether to focus on radial force or friction force, but the correct approach was confirmed to be based on the vertical forces balance. Ultimately, the participant found the correct answer and shared an image illustrating the solution, which involved a cone.
Slipjoints
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Finf the radial force caused by the horizontal component of the normal force
Relevant Equations
Balance equation
I have a question regarding a homework exercise. My professor asked me to find the radial force in the free body diagram in the image included. There is a weight Fz from above and it is assumed that it is countered by the vertical component of both the Ff (friction force) and the Fn (normal force). The radial force (Fr) is supposed to be equal to the horizontal component of Fn. The other thing I know for sure is that the friction coefficient (Greek letter mu) should be in the final expression for Fr. However he also says there should not be any squared trigonometric functions in the final expression and I can't seem to make that work. So basically I have to find an expression for fr from the vertical forces balance equation that includes the coefficient of friction and without squared trigonometric functions, anyone that can help?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0461.jpg
    IMG_0461.jpg
    80.7 KB · Views: 163
Physics news on Phys.org
Should it be force of friction rather than radial force?

Welcome!
 
Yeah that's what I thought too initially, but he specifically said I should use the balance equation of vertical forces and substitute the horizontal component of the normal force into it in order to get the radial force expression.
 
Lnewqban said:
Should it be force of friction rather than radial force?

Welcome!
By accident replied to the thread instead of to your comment, but my reply to you is reply #3
 
Lnewqban said:
Should it be force of friction rather than radial force?

Welcome!
Just found out the right answer, thanks for the help anyway. I added an image in case youre curious. last line is because it is actually a cone.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0464.jpg
    IMG_0464.jpg
    56.5 KB · Views: 141
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top