Finding radius a of non-conducting spherical shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of a uniformly charged non-conducting spherical shell given the electrostatic potentials at specific distances. The potential at the center is 200V, and at 50cm from the center, it is 40V. The relationship between potential and distance is established as V(r) = C/r^2, leading to two equations that can be solved for the constant C and the radius a. Participants clarify that C represents a constant related to charge, aiding in understanding the problem. The conversation concludes with a clearer approach to solving the radius based on the provided potentials.
Ryomega
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A non-conducting spherical shell is uniformly charged.
The electrostatic potential \phi at the centre of the sphere is \phi1 = 200V
The potential at distance r = 50cm from the centre is \phi2 = 40V
Find the radius of sphere: a

Homework Equations



I seem to have missed this lecture.

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that the potential (V) is a function of r (distance from centre) and satisfies:

V(0) = 200V
V(50) = 40V
V(a) = 0V

I've been reading up on this, but I can't seem to make sense out of this question. I can't seem to find a case for non conducting spherical shell. Would someone mind providing me a formula and clear steps to solve this problem?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "non-conducting" just means that you don't have to worry about the charge moving! Yes, V is a function of r- more specifically it is C/r^2.

So you have C/r^2= 200 and C/(r- 40)^2= 40, two equations you can solve for C and r.

Since you really only want to solve for r, I would recommending dividing one equation by another to eliminate C.
 
Thanks for the quick reply! I understand how to do the question now. is C just some constant? Or is it charge (Q)?

Not that it matters in this question but I'm certain I need to know this for other stuff.

Thanks again!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top