Finding Relevant Velocities in Counter-Propagating Colliding Beams

Rory9
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a conventional accelerator, the energy of the particles bombarding the target at rest is connected to their velocity by the relativistic formula where the relevant velocity of the bombarding particles v1 is the velocity relative to the target at rest, v1 = v1_rel. In an accelerator using two counter-propagating colliding beams of particles of equal energy, the energy of each beam is given by the same relativistic formula but the relevant velocity v2 \neq v2_rel. Determine v2_rel, stating the reference frame you are using.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm just not seeing something here. If I'm interpreting the question correctly, by 'relevant velocity' I presume it just means the velocity that was used to calculate the energy, which in the case of the first beam was the velocity of the beam relative to the target, but in the case of the second was not (?). So am I to take it that the energies have been calculated in different frames of ref, and happened to be equal on comparison? If so, not knowing what frame of reference was used to determine the second energy, I don't see that I can connect v2 and v2_rel, at the moment...

This is irritating me, as I'm sure the answer is simple, but I may not be interpreting the question correctly! Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rory9 said:
In a conventional accelerator, the energy of the particles bombarding the target at rest is connected to their velocity by the relativistic formula where the relevant velocity of the bombarding particles v1 is the velocity relative to the target at rest, v1 = v1_rel. In an accelerator using two counter-propagating colliding beams of particles of equal energy, the energy of each beam is given by the same relativistic formula but the relevant velocity v2 \neq v2_rel. Determine v2_rel, stating the reference frame you are using.
I don't understand the question. I don't think you are given enough information. What is the definition of v2? What is the definition of v2_rel?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top