Finding Riccati Solution of A*X+A'*X+X*W*X+Q: Hamiltonian Matrix H

  • Thread starter Thread starter gs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the Riccati solution for the equation A*X + A'*X + X*W*X + Q, focusing on the stability of the matrix A + W*X. It highlights that the existence of the solution X is linked to the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian matrix H, which must not lie on the imaginary axis. The relationship between the eigenvalues of H and the stability conditions of A + W*X is emphasized, noting that negative real parts indicate stability. There is confusion regarding the dimensions of the matrices involved and the significance of certain symbols in the equations. Clarification is sought on how the absence of eigenvalues on the imaginary axis is sufficient for the existence of X.
gs
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
in finding riccati solution of

A*X+A'*X+X*W*X+Q that is

X which stabilises A+W*X(real parts of eigen values are <0) ,it’s existence can
Found out by
Eigen values of Hamiltonian matrix H given by


H MATRIX=
!A W!
!Q -A!
because we have the relation

EIGEN VALUE OF H ARE GIVEN BY= EIGENVALUES OF (A+W*x)& - (A+W*x);

In text it is stated as if there is no eigen values of H are on imaginary axis then X exists

Means it can have in real parts of ( eigen values can be >0)

This can be possible
If A+W*x has negative real parts

And also A+W*x has positive real parts in which it is un stable

If it is so how can we say that just H matrix not having eigen values on imaginary axis is
Sufficient for X toexist
Can anyone explain me about this
Thanking you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
this relation of eigen values of h and (a,w)is valid for x stable hence it is sufficient
 
gs said:
in finding riccati solution of

A*X+A'*X+X*W*X+Q that is

I'm a little confused. What are the dimensions of these quantities? Are they matrices? Vectors? Scalars?

EIGEN VALUE OF H ARE GIVEN BY= EIGENVALUES OF (A+W*x)& - (A+W*x);

Is there some significance to the symbols & and ; here?
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top