Finding Sequence Limits: Proving r(sub-n) Approaches 2/3 | Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the limit of the sequence (n^2 + n - 1) / (3n^2 + 1) as n approaches infinity, which is determined to be 1/3. To prove that the remainder r(sub-n) approaches 2/3, participants suggest dividing both the numerator and denominator by n^2 and confirm that the remainder is 2n/3. Additionally, to find an N such that the difference between the function and the limit is less than specified values (1/10, 1/100, 1/1000), inequalities based on the limit definition are set up and solved. The conversation emphasizes using polynomial division and limit concepts to achieve the desired results. Overall, the thread provides a step-by-step approach to understanding sequence limits.
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello all

For the sequence (n^2 + n -1 )/ (3n^2 +1) I am trying to find

lim (n^2 + n -1)/ (3n^2 +1) = 1/3
n -> 00


My solution"

= 1 - (2n^2 - n +2/ 3n^2 +1) = 1- r(sub-n)

We need to prove that r(sub-n) approaches 2/3.

Hence 2n^2 - n + 2 < 2n^3
3n^2 + 1 > 3n^2

The remainder r sub n is 2n/3. Is this right? How would I find the remainder?

Also how do I find an N such that n > N and the difference between f(x) and L is less than 1/ 10, 1/100, and 1/1000.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please do not post the same question repeatedly (and how did it become "homework" in three hours?).

You prove that "r(sub-n)" approaches 2/3 as n-> infinity exactly the same way you would prove (n^2+ n-1)/(3n^2+1)-> 1/3: divide both numerator and denominator by n^2.
 
for sharing your solution and question with us. To prove that r(sub-n) approaches 2/3, we can use the concept of limits. The limit of a sequence is the value that the sequence approaches as n gets larger and larger. In this case, we want to show that as n approaches infinity, r(sub-n) approaches 2/3.

To find the remainder, we can use polynomial division. Dividing 2n^2 - n + 2 by 3n^2 + 1, we get a remainder of 2n/3. This is correct.

To find an N such that n > N and the difference between f(x) and L is less than 1/10, 1/100, and 1/1000, we can use the definition of limits. For example, to find an N such that the difference between f(x) and 2/3 is less than 1/10, we can set up the following inequality:

|f(x) - 2/3| < 1/10

Substituting in the expression for f(x), we get:

|(n^2 + n -1)/ (3n^2 +1) - 2/3| < 1/10

We can solve this inequality for n to find the value of N. Similarly, we can set up and solve inequalities for the other values (1/100 and 1/1000) to find the corresponding N values.

I hope this helps. Keep practicing and exploring different methods to find limits. Good luck!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top