Finding Spring Constant/Compression

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobBarker444
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the spring constant and compression distance for a crash barrier scenario involving a 1350-kg vehicle. The initial calculations for maximum acceleration and spring compression yielded incorrect results in the online homework system. Participants noted that the kinematic equations used were inappropriate due to the variable nature of acceleration during the spring's compression. They suggested using two equations, \( ma = kx \) and \( \frac{1}{2} kx^2 = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \), to solve for the unknowns algebraically. The correct values for the spring constant and compression distance were ultimately derived, emphasizing the need to consider the changing acceleration as the spring compresses.
BobBarker444
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We have online homework that checks our answers when input. I'm pretty confident about this problem, but it won't take my answers.

1. Homework Statement

A student proposes a design for an automobile crash barrier in which a 1350-kg sport utility vehicle moving at 25.0m/s crashes into a spring of negligible mass that slows it to a stop. So that the passengers are not injured, the acceleration of the vehicle as it slows can be no greater than 5.00g.

a) Find the required spring constant k. In your calculation, disregard any deformation or crumpling of the vehicle and the friction between the vehicle and the ground.

b) Find the distance the spring will compress in slowing the vehicle to a stop.

Homework Equations



W = (1/2)kx^2 (work done by spring)
v^2 = vo^2 + 2a(x) (to find x given a)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I used 5.00(g) = 5(9.8) = 49 to find the maximum acceleration. I plugged this into v^2 = vi^2 + 2a(x) and got x = 6.38 m. This should be the answer to b), but the online homework program says it is wrong.

I see no way to solve a) without b). I used W=(1/2)kx^2 (work done by a spring), set equal to (1/2)mv^2 (the kinetic energy of the car). Solving for k and plugging in values, I got 20731 N/m. The online homework program also rejected this answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello BobBarker444, Welcome to Physics Forums! :)

BobBarker444 said:
We have online homework that checks our answers when input. I'm pretty confident about this problem, but it won't take my answers.

1. Homework Statement

A student proposes a design for an automobile crash barrier in which a 1350-kg sport utility vehicle moving at 25.0m/s crashes into a spring of negligible mass that slows it to a stop. So that the passengers are not injured, the acceleration of the vehicle as it slows can be no greater than 5.00g.

a) Find the required spring constant k. In your calculation, disregard any deformation or crumpling of the vehicle and the friction between the vehicle and the ground.

b) Find the distance the spring will compress in slowing the vehicle to a stop.

Homework Equations



W = (1/2)kx^2 (work done by spring)
v^2 = vo^2 + 2a(x) (to find x given a)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I used 5.00(g) = 5(9.8) = 49 to find the maximum acceleration. I plugged this into v^2 = vi^2 + 2a(x) and got x = 6.38 m. This should be the answer to b), but the online homework program says it is wrong.

I see no way to solve a) without b). I used W=(1/2)kx^2 (work done by a spring), set equal to (1/2)mv^2 (the kinetic energy of the car). Solving for k and plugging in values, I got 20731 N/m. The online homework program also rejected this answer.

For what it's worth, I came up with the same answers that you did (ignoring any minor rounding differences).
 
You cannot use ##v^2 = v_o^2 + 2ax##, as acceleration is not constant. (Recall derivation of SUVAT equations.)

Equation for part (a) Looks alright.

Equation for part (b): Hint - use ##F = ma = kx##

Code:

Code:
Solve[{1/2*1350 * 25^2 ==  1/2 k x^2 && 5*9.81 ==  k x/1350}, {k, x}]

Using Mathematica, I obtained ##k = 5196.75 N m^{-1}##, ##x = 12.7421 m##.
 
Last edited:
Doh! o:) <slaps self on forehead>

Yes, like unscientific said, the kinematics equations for uniform acceleration do not apply here. 'Looks like we both made that mistake, BobBarker444.

However, you shouldn't need to use Mathematica to solve this. Just realize that you have two equations, ma = kx and \frac{1}{2} kx^2 = \frac{1}{2}mv^2. And you have two unknowns, k and x. That's enough to solve the problem with algebra.

Note that the value of the acceleration, a varies when the car is still moving and the spring has not reached its maximum compression. We know that the force on the car, thus the car's acceleration, increases the more the spring is compressed. But when the spring reaches the compression necessary to cause the acceleration to be 5g, we do not need to treat a as a variable: we ask ourselves, "what is the x that causes a = 5g, when using the ma = kx equation?" So a is not an unknown. The only unknowns left are x and k.
 
Last edited:
collinsmark said:
Doh! o:) <slaps self on forehead>

Yes, like unscientific said, the kinematics equations for uniform acceleration do not apply here. 'Looks like we both made that mistake, BobBarker444.

However, you shouldn't need to use Mathematica to solve this. Just realize that you have two equations, ma = kx and \frac{1}{2} kx^2 = \frac{1}{2}mv^2. And you have two unknowns, k and x. That's enough to solve the problem with algebra.

Note that the value of the acceleration, a varies when the car is still moving and the spring has not reached its maximum compression. We know that the force on the car, thus the car's acceleration, increases the more the spring is compressed. But when the spring reaches the compression necessary to cause the acceleration to be 5g, we do not need to treat a as a variable: we ask ourselves, "what is the x that causes a = 5g, when using the ma = kx equation?" So a is not an unknown. The only unknowns left are x and k.

Haha, I am generally lazy so I used mathematica to solve it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top