Finding Tension in a Ring on a Smooth Hoop

  • Thread starter Thread starter omegasquared
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring Smooth
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ring of mass m sliding on a smooth circular hoop in a vertical plane, connected to the top of the hoop by a spring. The objective is to show the relationship between the angle θ that the spring makes with the vertical in static equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss resolving forces in one direction and question the assumptions about the direction of the normal force. There is an exploration of how to correctly represent the forces acting on the ring and the implications of frictionless conditions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying the setup through diagrams and questioning the assumptions made about the forces involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding resolving forces in a direction that eliminates the normal force from consideration.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the frictionless nature of the problem, which affects the direction of the normal force. Participants are also navigating the constraints of the problem as stated in the homework prompt.

omegasquared
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ring of mass m slides on a smooth circular hoop with radius r in the vertical plane. The ring is connected to the top of the hoop by a spring with natural length r and spring constant k.

By resolving in one direction only show that in static equilibrium the angle the spring makes to the vertical is θ where:

cos\theta = \frac{1}{2}\cdot \frac{1}{1-\frac{mg}{kr}}

Homework Equations



T=kx

The Attempt at a Solution



To find the equation for tension:

L=2rcos\theta\\<br /> T = kr(2cos\theta - 1)

Resolving vertically I got:

Tcos\theta = Rcos\theta + mg

and horizontally:

Rsin\theta = Tsin\theta

The above can't be correct and also I've resolved in two directions where the question has only asked for one. The forces I have drawn on my diagram are tension and reaction parallel but in opposite directions and weight straight down.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. Welcome to PF!

A diagram of the setup would be helpful. Based on some of your work, I think I understand the system.

Are you sure the reaction force (normal force), R, makes the angle θ to the vertical?

Since you are asked to resolve forces in one direction only, try to resolve the forces in an appropriate direction that is neither horizontal nor vertical.
 
I've attached the provided diagram of the system.

I assume the action force would make the same angle θ as it's been pulled in that direction by the tension.

Resolving parallel to the reaction & tension would yield a result still involving R though.
 

Attachments

  • FullSizeRender.jpg
    FullSizeRender.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 434
Thanks for the diagram. That makes the setup clear.

I don't think your assumption about the direction of the reaction force is correct. You are apparently supposed to assume no friction between the ring and the hoop. So, the reaction force is a "normal force".

You won't be able to make one resolution parallel to the reaction and tension since those two forces are not in the same direction.
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
Thanks for the diagram. That makes the setup clear.

I don't think your assumption that about the direction of the reaction force is correct. You are apparently supposed to assume no friction between the ring and the hoop. So, the reaction force is a "normal force".

You won't be able to make one resolution parallel to the reaction and tension since those two forces are not in the same direction.

If it's a normal force, what is it normal to? The surface/edge of the hoop?
 
Yes, it's normal to the surface of the hoop.
 
TSny said:
Yes, it's normal to the surface of the hoop.

Like in the modified diagram attached?
 

Attachments

  • FullSizeRender.jpg
    FullSizeRender.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 507
No. In your diagram, R is not perpendicular to the surface of the ring.
 
TSny said:
No. In your diagram, R is not perpendicular to the surface of the ring.

Sorry, noticed that almost straight away. Thanks for your help there.

I'm still unsure how it is possible to resolve to get a value for cosθ which doesn't involve R though.
 
  • #10
To get a relation that does not involve R, resolve along a direction for which R has zero component.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: omegasquared
  • #11
TSny said:
To get a relation that does not involve R, resolve along a direction for which R has zero component.

Thanks, that pointed me in the right direction! Much appreciated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
14K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K