Finding the angle between two magnitudes.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daweih
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Magnitudes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the angle between two displacements of magnitudes 3.3 m and 4.3 m that result in specific resultant magnitudes (5.1 m, 2.8 m, and 4.7 m). The law of cosines is correctly identified as the appropriate method for solving this problem, but there is confusion regarding the interpretation of the angle calculated. The angle derived from the law of cosines represents the angle when the vectors are placed head to tail, not the angle between their directions. Clarification is provided that the angle between the vectors' directions is the supplement of the angle calculated. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to use a variation of the law of cosines for accurate results.
Daweih
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Consider two displacements, one of magnitude 3.3 m and another of magnitude 4.3 m. What angle between the directions of this two displacements give a resultant displacement of magnitude (a) 5.1 m, (b) 2.8 m, and (c) 4.7 m.



Homework Equations


I've been using the law of cosine to work out this problem, but my answers have all come out to be wrong. Am I incorrect in using it to solve this problem or am I just doing my math wrong?

c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2abcosγ


My answers are as follows: a) 83° b) 41° c)75°

I would really appreciate the help. =(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Daweih said:
Consider two displacements, one of magnitude 3.3 m and another of magnitude 4.3 m. What angle between the directions of this two displacements give a resultant displacement of magnitude (a) 5.1 m, (b) 2.8 m, and (c) 4.7 m.

Homework Equations


I've been using the law of cosine to work out this problem, but my answers have all come out to be wrong. Am I incorrect in using it to solve this problem or am I just doing my math wrong?

c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2abcosγ

My answers are as follows: a) 83° b) 41° c)75°

I would really appreciate the help. =(
Without working the problem myself: (Don't you love it when someone qualifies their answer this way?)

I suspect that your answers are correct for the angle the vectors make if you lay them head to tail, as you would in constructing a triangle composed of the two vectors and their resultant.

However, that is not the same as the angle between the vectors directions. The angle between the vectors directions is the supplement of the angle between the vectors when placed head to tail.
 
Ah, I understand now. Thank you very much. That clears up everything for me. =)
 
You are correct with Law of Cosines. I got 83.18 for a, so your data is correct. How are you drawing a,b and c? Hopefully you can see that (for a) C=5.1m
I can't just give you the answer, but try a variation of law of cosines:

C=cos-1(a2+b2-c2)/(2ab)

Try that.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top