Finding the angle of an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
A 1900 kg car experiences a consistent force of air resistance and friction while traveling at 27 m/s, requiring an additional 47 hp (or 35060 Watts) to maintain speed going uphill compared to downhill. The user attempts to calculate the incline angle using power and force equations but finds conflicting results, yielding angles of less than 1° and about 2°. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of the variable 'P' and the setup of the force equations. Clarifications suggest that 'P' represents power and that the equations must reflect the correct signs for forces. The discussion highlights the complexities in solving for the incline angle and the need for precise equation formulation.
scimanyd
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This should be an easy question, but I am having problems with my conflicting solutions. Maybe someone could help.

A 1900 kg car experiences a combined force of air resistance and friction that has the same magnitude whether the car goes up or down the hill at 27 m/s. Going up a hill, the car's engine needs to produce 47 hp more power to sustain the constant velocity than it does going down the same hill. At what angle is the hill inclined above the horizontal?

My approach:

First P=Fv ... so I sub in Force =Power/velocity
and then set up my force equations in the x direction which I set parallel to the inclined plane.

Assuming Power up = power down + 47hp(or 35060Watts)

UP: P/v - sinθmg - (friction+air resistance) = 0
DOWN: (P+47hp)/v + sinθmg - (friction+air resistance) = 0

I tried setting these two equations equal to each other and I come up with theta <1°
I tried solving for P in one and then subbing into the other and solving for Theta and I get theta = about 2°.
Still this seams unreasonably low, I wouldn't think that it would take 47hp more to go up a 2° incline
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you specify what the variable 'P' is supposed to represent? Also, are you sure that the first term in both of your expressions makes sense?
 
Yes, P stands for power
I substituted P/v in for my applied force, since power = Force*velocity
I should be allowed to make the sub.

the equations simplified: Force - weight(portion along x axis) - Friction = 0 ... (constant velocity tells me that the equation is in equalibrium)
 
In second equation instead of
P+47 you had to write P-47

enjoy
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top