Finding the Anti-Derivative of x*cosh(x^2) using Hyperbolic Identities

Gondur
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the anti derivative of \int xcosh (x^2) dx

Homework Equations



By parts formula and Hyperbolic Identities of sinh x and cosh x as well as others

The Attempt at a Solution



\int xcosh (x^2) dx

The problem I'm having is integrating \int cosh (x^2) dx

I tried setting variables u=x and \frac{dv}{dx}= \int cosh (x^2) dx with the assumption this could be solved using the by parts formula.

I then concentrated specifically on solving \int cosh (x^2) dx. I haven't found a method that I know of that's appropriate given that the composite is (x^2) and not (cosh x)^2. Wolfram Alpha shows the solution with an error function - which I know nothing about yet.

I've touched up on Euler's formula cosx+isinx=e^{ix} and its parallel sinhx+coshx=e^x and I'm just about to learn its applications, maybe it should be used here. This area is new to me so light explanations are wise at this time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need parts, all you need is u-substitution. u = x^2 and du = 2x dx
 
Panphobia said:
You don't need parts, all you need is u-substitution. u = x^2 and du = 2x dx

I tried that but gave up because of the extraneous x which would mean substituting it for \sqrt {u}.

The x in the numerator cancels ut the out in x in the denominator.

Sorry I got it.
 
look
u = x^2
du = 2x * dx

du/2 = x * dx

(1/2)∫cosh(u)du

Now from there its pretty easy as you can see.
 
Panphobia said:
look
u = x^2
du = 2x * dx

du/2 = x * dx

(1/2)∫cosh(u)du

Now from there its pretty easy as you can see.


Yes the x variables cancel each other out. I figured it out
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top