Finding the Center of Mass of a Lamina with Proportional Density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass of a lamina defined by the semicircles \(y=\sqrt{1-x^{2}}\) and \(y=\sqrt{4-x^{2}}\), with density proportional to the distance from the origin. The correct density function is established as \(f(x,y)=k\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}\), clarifying that the lamina is a 2D object, thus ignoring the Z-axis. Participants address confusion regarding the formulation of the density function and its implications for the center of mass calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2D coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of density functions in physics
  • Familiarity with semicircular equations
  • Basic principles of center of mass calculation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of density functions in 2D objects
  • Learn about calculating center of mass for irregular shapes
  • Explore the implications of density variations on mass distribution
  • Investigate the use of polar coordinates in lamina problems
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those studying mechanics and mass distribution, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to center of mass in laminae.

mrcleanhands

Homework Statement


The boundary of a lamina consists of the semicircles y=\sqrt{1-x^{2}} and y=\sqrt{4-x^{2}} together with the portions of the x-axis that join them. Find the centre of mass of the lamina if the density at any point is proportion to its distance from the origin.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


My issue here is only in turning the statement "the density at any point is proportion to its distance from the origin" into a function.

The solution is f(x,y)=k\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} but why are they ignoring Z here? Since the lamina is in 3D right?

If I try turn this statement into a function I get f(x,y) = k\sqrt{f(x,y)^{2} + x^{2} + y^{2}} which doesn't work. Where have I gone wrong in my thinking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The shape is given as a 2D-object. How did you get the second equation, and what does it represent?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K