Finding the Center of Mass of a pendulum

AI Thread Summary
To find the center of mass of a pendulum system with two balls and a cord, the center of mass is influenced more by the heavier lower ball. The approach involves calculating the center of mass for the balls first, with the understanding that the center of mass of the cord is typically located at its midpoint. The relevant equation for determining the center of mass is the weighted average of the positions of the masses. Balancing the system conceptually helps identify the center of mass, as it should be closer to the heavier components. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the distribution of mass in the system.
antigen123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assuming that the combined mass of the balls is greater than the combined mass of the cords, but that the cords do have some mass, where is the center of mass for the system shown below?



Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried approaching this problem by finding the center of mass for the two balls first. I picked a point closer to the lower ball which is heavier. However I don't know how I would find the center of mass of the cord?? Is the center of mass usually closer to heavier objects. I think I need a conceptual understanding of the center of mass.
 

Attachments

  • finding center of mass.png
    finding center of mass.png
    6.9 KB · Views: 1,340
Physics news on Phys.org
well, write down the relevant equation !

The pragmatic one is: where do you support something to get a balance ? Good for individual sticks and balls. For a rope with weight: imagine it's frozen.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
My book did not give an equation for solving this particular question. However I do like the idea of finding a balance in the object in order to find the center of mass. Thanks!
 
The relevant equation for the position of the center of mass is
$$\vec r_{\rm c.o.m.} = {\sum_i m_i \, \vec r_i \over \sum_i m_i }$$check it out.
For each ball you end up in the center of the thing and for each section of rope you end up halfway. Comes naturally. Adding the four vectors according to the relevant formula can never let you end up at a (why not?) or at b (why not?) and some judgment about M2 > M1 leaves only one answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top