Finding the center of mass of an incomplete circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the x-coordinate of the center of mass for a circular arc with a radius of 170 mm, spanning from (-5/6)π to (5/6)π. The initial calculations yielded an incorrect result of 32.468 mm, prompting a review of the integration limits and the method used. It was clarified that the correct angle limits should be -2π/3 to +2π/3, which would yield the expected answer of 70.3 mm. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying problem parameters and the potential for discrepancies in provided solutions. Accurate unit representation and significant figures were also emphasized in the calculations.
Jbray
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Locate the x coordinate of the center of mass of the homogeneous rod bent into the shape of a circular arc. Take r = 170 .

The arc goes from (-5/6) to (5/6)pi (counterclockwise). It has a radius of 170mm.

Homework Equations



x=rcosθ, y=rsinθ, dL=r*dθ

The Attempt at a Solution



I found "M" by integrating "170 dθ" from (-5/6)pi to (5/6)pi. This gave me 890.12mm.I found "My" by integrating "170 (cosθ) 170 dθ" from (-5/6)pi to (5/6)pi. This gave me 170^2 or 28900mm.

I used My/M to find the x coordinate of the center of mass as 28900/890.12 or 32.468mm. However this is incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution looks good, but you miss the unit, and try to give the result with three significant digits.

ehild
 
I updated the units. I also found out that the answer is supposed to be 70.3mm but I still can't figure out how to get that.
 
Are the limits -5/6 and 5/6pi, or -5/6pi and 5/6pi? But even then, the result is different from that 70 mm. The given results happen to be wrong quite often.

ehild
 
Jbray said:
the answer is supposed to be 70.3mm
That would be the answer if the angle were -2π/3 to +2π/3.
 
haruspex said:
That would be the answer if the angle were -2π/3 to +2π/3.

You are a genius! So they took over the solution from an old version of the problem, while changing the limits in the problem text. :biggrin:

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top