Finding the Centre of Mass and Toppling Point of a Spinning Top

  • Thread starter Thread starter vic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the center of mass of a solid spinning top shaped like an inverted cone and a cylinder. The initial calculations yield a center of mass position that differs from the textbook answer, prompting a review of the density function used. It is clarified that the density function should be proportional to the cross-sectional area, simplifying the problem. The final calculations confirm that the center of mass is correctly determined using normalized units, leading to a better understanding of the toppling behavior when placed on a horizontal surface. The conversation concludes with a resolution of the confusion regarding the density function used in the calculations.
vic
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

A uniform solid spinning top has the shape of an inverted right circular cone of radius 3r and height 4r surmounted by a right circular of base radius 3r and height 6r. Find the position of the centre of mass of the spinning top and hence show that if it is placed with the curved surface of the cone on a horizontal plane the top will topple.


This is my answer
y = 0 by symmetry

54[Pi]r^3 (3r) + 3[Pi]r^2 (7r) = [54 [Pi] r^3 + 3[Pi] r^2] x

54r^2 + 7r = (18r + 1) x

x = (54 r^2 + 7r) /(18r +1)

But the textbook says the answer is (75/33)r from joint face :confused:


Please Help me. :bugeye:

 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I got the same answer as the book. To make it easy I used normalized length units with one of my units equalling "4r" of their units. Here's a really quick rough outline of my calculations.

x_c = integral(x f(x) dx) / integral(f(x) dx), where f(x) is the density function, normalized to any level you want.

integral(x f(x) dx) = integral(x^3, x=0..1) + integral(x,x=1..2.5) = 23/8

integral( f(x) dx) = integral(x^2, x=0..1) + integral(1, x=1..2,5) = 11/6

So x_c = 23*6/(11*8) in my normalized units.

In the original units that x_c = (69/11)r from the cones apex which is (25/11)r from the join.
 
Last edited:
How do you know that f(x) is x^2 +1 ??
 
vic said:
How do you know that f(x) is x^2 +1 ??

It's not, but all you need is something that is propotional to the true density since the center of mass will be the same whether it's made of lead or plastic, so long as it's the same uniform material throughout. Actually it's only the linear density I'm considering here, that is mass per unit length, that's all you need consider due to the symmetry in the other two dimensions.

So the linear density, "f(x)", is just a function proportional to the cross-sectional area at the position "x". That's all you need to do and it makes the problem fairly easy.

I made it even easier by choosing length unit of 1 unit = 4r of the original length units. This makes the width of the cylindrical portion be exactly 1 unit and the width of the conic portion changing linearly from 0 units to one unit width over a length of exactly one unit.

So in terms of my length units the cross-section of the conic part is proportional to x^2 and the cross-section of the cylindrical section is proportional to unity (with the same constant of proportionality in each case).

So actually the function I used for f(x) was :

f(x) = x^2 : for 0 <= x <= 1
f(x) = 1 : for 1 < x <= 2.5
f(x) = 0 : otherwise
 
Last edited:
I got it now. Thanks a lot. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top