Finding the de Broglie wavelength from momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the de Broglie wavelength of a neutron with a momentum of 300 MeV/c. The correct formula for the wavelength is λ = h/p, where p is the momentum. Participants clarify that MeV/c is already a momentum unit, negating the need to divide by the speed of light. There is confusion regarding the conversion of MeV to SI units, with some participants mistakenly thinking they need to adjust for the speed of light. Ultimately, the consensus is that the initial calculations for momentum were correct, and the given answer for the wavelength appears to be inaccurate.
Matty R
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the de Broglie wavelength of a neutron traveling with a momentum equal to 300 \frac{\text{MeV}}{\text{c}}?


Homework Equations



\lambda = \frac{h}{p}

The Attempt at a Solution



p = \frac{300 \cdot \left( \left(1\times10^6 \right) \times \left(1.602\times10^{-19} \right) \right)}{2.998\times10^8}

= 1.603\times10^{-19} \text{ kgms}^{-1}

\lamda = \frac{6.626\times10^{-34}}{1.603\times10^{-19}}

= 4.133\times10^{-15} \text{ m}

That's what I get, but the answer is given as 1.38x10^{-23}m.

By inserting this given answer into the equation, I get a value of 4.801x10^{-11} for p, which I can only get by the following:

300 \frac{\text{MeV}}{\text{c}} = 300 \cdot \left( \left( 1\times10^6 \right) \times \left(1.602\times10^{-19} \right) \right)

which ignores the c.

Is the given answer wrong, or am I missing something important?

This doesn't make any sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The unit MeV/c is actually a unit of momentum...no need to divide by the speed of light, it is already factored in through the use of this unit notation.

Generically, energy units consist of the quantities (mass)(length)2 / (time)2. If you were to divide energy by speed, you would be left with (mass)(length)/(time) which is a momentum unit.
 

1 MeV/c ≈ 5.344285×10-22 kg·m/s

So, 300 MeV/c ≈ 1.603×10-19 kg·m/s as you calculated.

 
Thanks for the replies. :smile:

Sorry. I'm still a bit confused.

To convert MeV/c to SI Units, do I just multiply the number (ie: 300) by "M" multiplied by "eV"?

I thought I was supposed to work it out as SammyS did, but doing that gives a different answer to the solutions.

EDIT

Galileo's Ghost said:
The unit MeV/c is actually a unit of momentum...no need to divide by the speed of light, it is already factored in through the use of this unit notation.

Generically, energy units consist of the quantities (mass)(length)2 / (time)2. If you were to divide energy by speed, you would be left with (mass)(length)/(time) which is a momentum unit.

Okay. MeV is a measurement of energy, units kgm^{2}s^{-2}. Dividing by speed (ms^{-1}) gives kgm^{-1}, which is momentum in SI units. So won't I need to divide my energy by speed, as you said?
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top