Finding the distance between 2 charges in electric equilibrium.

AI Thread Summary
To find the distance from charge A to charge C in electrostatic equilibrium, the relationship between the forces acting on charge C from charges A and B must be established. The distance AC is represented as r, while distance BC is 2.2 - r. The forces are set equal due to equilibrium, leading to the equation 1/r² = 2/(2.2 - r)². Algebraic errors were noted in the expansion of the equation, specifically missing the 4.4r term. Correcting these mistakes will help in solving for the distance of charge C from charge A.
Ram012593
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Charge A and charge B are 2.2m apart.Charge A is 1.0C, and charge B is 2.0c. Charge C, which is 2.0C, is located between them and is in electrostatic equilibrium. How far from charge A is charge C.


Homework Equations


E = KcQ1Q2/r^2-------Electric force Formula where E = electric force, Kc = 8.99*10^9, r = radius
E=Kq/r^2--------------Electric field formula where q = charge of particle, E = electric field, K = 8.99 * 10^9
EQ = F----------------E = electric field, Q = charge of particle, F = force


The Attempt at a Solution



Not really sure how to start this one so if anyone would help me it would be great thanks much in advanced!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ram012593! :wink:

If the distance AC is r, then the distance BC is 2.2 - r.

Show us what you get. :smile:
 
Ok I've tried setting the formulas for the forces equal to each other since its electric equilibrium so the forces must be the same and tried to solve for ra the radius of the first two and I am not sure if i did it incorrectly or i made an algebra mistake it could easily be both as I'm not very good at algebra at the moment if anyone would correct me this would be great thanks much:D. Here is a link to a snapshot i took of what i did so far. If i am doing it correctly which is not likely can someone tell me how I could continue. http://postimg.org/image/q4md6ins1/
 
Hi Ram012593! :smile:
Ram012593 said:
… I'm not very good at algebra at the moment …

Yes, your method is fine, but your algebra has let you down :redface:

your 1/r2 = 2/(2.2 - r)2 is correct :smile:,

but you left out the 4.4r term when you expanded that square! :confused:

(btw, why use two letters, ra, or maybe ra, when one letter will do? :wink:)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top