Finding the electric field for a point above the center of a square loop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at a point above the center of a square loop with a uniform line charge. The approach involves breaking down the problem into four line integrals, with the realization that horizontal components of the electric fields cancel out, leaving only the vertical components to integrate. The correct expression for one of the line integrals is presented, and it is confirmed that contributions from all sides of the square loop can be combined due to symmetry. Additionally, a substitution method is suggested to simplify the integration process, relating it to a previous example in Griffiths' textbook. Overall, the participants are working through the complexities of electromagnetism and integral calculus to arrive at the solution.
JasonJo
Messages
425
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the electric field a distance z above the center of a square loop carrying a uniform line charge Q.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So we want the electric field generated by the charges that lie on the boundary of the "square loop" - it's just a square or a rhombus with equal lengths.

I attempted to solve this by splitting up the integral into 4 line integrals (each side of the square loop being an integral). Since the charge is uniform, I pull that out of the integral.

Furthermore, all the horizontal components of the electric fields cancels out so we need to integrate the vertical components, i.e. cos(\theta) = \frac{z}{\sqrt( (x-x_{0})^{2} + (y-y_{0})^{2} + z^{2})}

Am I correct to assume that one of my integrals will look like this:

\frac{Qz}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int_{0}^{a}\frac{dx}{((x-x_{0})^{2} +(y-y_{0})^{2} + z^{2})^{3/2}}

Since R^{2} = (x-x_{0})^{2} + (y-y_{0})^{2} + z^{2}, i.e. assume the points on the square's boundary are (x, y, 0) and the point above the center of the square loop as coordinates (x_{0}, y_{0}, z)[\tex]<br /> <br /> z is a fixed number!<br /> <br /> My questions are:<br /> 1) Would this be a correct expression for one of the line integrals?<br /> 2) How exactly do I integrate such an expression? Am I not seeing the antiderivative?<br /> <br /> Sorry if I&#039;m not being clear or concise, this is my first attempt at learning electromagnetism (I&#039;m learning out of Griffiths and I am having a little trouble with all the notation and what not).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume we are talking about problem 2.4 in Griffiths?

We put the origon of our coordinate-system in the center of the square. Now we look at one of the sides - we can choose the right one, whose parameter is:

r'(t) = (a/2 ; t ; 0)

where t runs from -a/2 to a/2.

Our vector r (the one going from the origin to our field point) is just (0 ; 0 ; z). So we put this in the expression for the electric field:

<br /> E = \frac{\lambda }{{4\pi \varepsilon _0 }}\int_{ - \frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}} {\frac{z}{{\left( {\left( {\frac{a}{2}} \right)^2 + t^2 + z^2 } \right)^{\frac{3}{2}} }}} \,dt<br />

This is the contribution in the z-direction, since all the other components cancel out. The other 3 sides give the same contribution, so just multiply the result by 4, and then you're set.

EDIT: Actually, I see this is what you have already done.. perhaps I should start reading threads before commenting them.
 
Last edited:
E = \frac{\lambda }{{4\pi \varepsilon _0 }}\int_{ - \frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}} {\frac{z}{{\left( {\left( {\frac{a}{2}} \right)^2 + t^2 + z^2 } \right)^{\frac{3}{2}} }}} \,dt

Looks right. But it only looks like that because of symmetri so that E only has a komponent in the z direction. Now just substitute the constants together and it looks completely like ex 2.1 in griffith :)
 
Hi.

Regarding this question, my friend said all you have to do is use Example 2.1 and substitute L for a/2 and z for \sqrt{z^{2} + (\frac {a} {2})^{2}}

This gives the right answer... I understand the substitution for L however the substitution for z I can't get. Anyone care to shed some light?
 
I believe that they want you to look at the previous example with the wire. If we are to chop the square loop into infinitely thin wires, then there would be pairs of wires with opposing electric fields, except for the wire directly under the charge. Therefore you simply refer to the problem before and subsititue a/2 (square loop has side a, they integrated from 0 to L and doubled the answer) for L.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top