Finding the electron increases if we go towards the nucleus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter photon79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Nucleus
photon79
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Is it true that the probability of finding the electron (s-electron) increases if we go towards the nucleus? then what accounts for its stability from not being attracted by the nucleus n collapsing into it..its a basic question but i don't have an idea now! Is it just the concept of constant orbits in which electron doesn't lose or gain energy??more info pls!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
photon79 said:
Is it true that the probability of finding the electron (s-electron) increases if we go towards the nucleus?

Only up to the Bohr radius.

After that the probability decreases towards zero. I suspect that you are confused because you are looking at the square modulus of the wave function and you see that it increases monotonically as r \rightarrow 0. But you have to remember that that probability density function must be weighted by the factor 4\pi r^2. This weighted probability density is the so-called radial probability density, and it attains its maximum value at the Bohr radius.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top