What is the mass of 55 Cancri in kg and solar masses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lauren0619
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The mass of 55 Cancri was calculated using the average values of R^3/T^2 from three orbiting planets, resulting in an initial estimate of 1.73 x 10^31 kg. After recalculating the average to 3.13 x 10^18, the corrected mass was found to be 1.85 x 10^30 kg. This value is confirmed to be in kilograms, with no additional conversions needed. The conversion to solar masses yielded a result of approximately 0.93 Ms. The calculations and conversions were deemed reasonable based on the provided data.
Lauren0619
Messages
11
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have to find the mass of 55 Cancri in kg using the average orbits of 3 orbiting planets. Specifically, "Using the average of the values of R^3/T^2 that you filled in just for planets c, f, and d in #2, approximately what is the mass of 55 Cancri in kg?
planet c = 3.14 x 10^18
planet f = 3.16 x 10^18
planet d = 3.10 x 10^18

Then to convert the mass in kg to solar masses.

Homework Equations


M=(4pi^2/G)(R^3/T^2) With T equaling the period

The Attempt at a Solution


(3.14 x 10^18) + (3.16 x 10^18) + (3.10 x 10^18) / 3 = 7.3 x 10^31
M= (4pi^2/6.67x10^11)(7.3x10^18) = 1.73x10^31 kg

Is this correct? Or is this value in another form that I need to convert to kg?

And then would it convert to 8.70 Ms (solar masses)?

Please help! Thank you all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of your data values are close to 3 x 1018, so I would expect their average to be similar. Check your average calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes Lauren0619
gneill said:
All of your data values are close to 3 x 1018, so I would expect their average to be similar. Check your average calculation.
Thanks gneill! I redid the calculations. You were right. For my average I got 3.13x10^18. I plugged that into the formula to calculate mass and got 1.85x10^30 kg. Is this correct?
 
Yes, that looks much better.
 
  • Like
Likes Lauren0619
gneill said:
Yes, that looks much better.
Cool! And just to be sure, this is in kilograms, right? I wasn't sure if there was a conversion that I needed to do that was missing.

Also, I redid the conversion to solar masses from kilograms and got .93Ms.
 
Lauren0619 said:
Cool! And just to be sure, this is in kilograms, right? I wasn't sure if there was a conversion that I needed to do that was missing.
Your problem statement didn't mention what units the R^3/T^2 values were given in so I can't say decisively, but it would make sense that they'd be in ##m^3/s^2##, giving you a result in kg.
Also, I redid the conversion to solar masses from kilograms and got .93Ms.
That looks reasonable.
 
  • Like
Likes Lauren0619
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top