Finding the Molarity of the Reactant

  • Thread starter Thread starter derwalrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molarity
AI Thread Summary
To find the molarity of Iron(III) Chloride (FeCl3), 96 grams dissolved in 300 mL yields approximately 2M. The calculation shows 0.59 moles of FeCl3, leading to a molarity of 1.77 moles of chloride ions (Cl-) in the solution. This results in a chloride molarity of about 5.9M. However, it's important to note that Iron(III) chloride is often found as a hexahydrate, which may affect the molar mass used in calculations. The final results depend on the specific form of Iron(III) chloride being considered.
derwalrus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


96 grams of Iron(III)Chloride is dissolved in water to give 300ml of solution. What is the Molarity of Iron(III)Chloride? What is the Molarity of just the Chloride?


Homework Equations


FeCl3 + H2O → Fe+3 + 3Cl-


The Attempt at a Solution


96g FeCl3 X (1 mol FeCl3 / 162.2g FeCl3) = .59 mol FeCl3

Then I found the molarity of the solution.
.59 mol FeCl3 / .3L solution ≈ 2M solution.

I'm just confused as to where I go from here to find the molarity of the FeCl3 and then the Cl. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!

Edit: Did some more tinkering.

.59 mol FeCl3 X (3 mol Cl- / 1 mol FeCl3) = 1.77 mol Cl-

M Cl-= 1.77 mol Cl- / .300 L
M Cl- = 5.9M
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your working is correct :smile:
 
There is one small problem. Iron(III) chloride as a solid is usually present in the form of hexahydrate. Not knowing the context in which the question was asked it is hard to say if your molar mass is right or not.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top