Finding the moment(s) of inertia

  • Thread starter Thread starter dinospamoni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moments of inertia (Ixx, Iyy, Izz) for a spherical wedge with a radius of 14 cm and a density of 4500 kg/m3. The user initially struggles with expressing the differential volume (dV) in terms of Cartesian coordinates and considers using spherical coordinates. They calculate the volume of the wedge and its mass but find it unhelpful for their calculations. Ultimately, they successfully convert the problem to spherical coordinates and apply triple integration to find the correct moments of inertia. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding coordinate systems and integration techniques in physics.
dinospamoni
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A wedge of a sphere of radius 14 cm (similar to one
segment of an orange) is oriented so that the axis is aligned
with the z-axis, one face is in the xz plane, and the other
is inclined at an angle of α = 29o
, as shown. The wedge is
made of metal having a density of 4500 kg/m3
. In the coordinate system shown, compute a) Ixx, b) Iyy, and c) Izz.

The picture is attached

Homework Equations



I know that

I_xx= ∫(y^2+z^2)ρ dV
I_yy= ∫(x^2+z^2)ρ dV
I_zz= ∫(y^2+y^2)ρ dV

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having trouble thinking of how to replace the dV with something in terms of x y and z

The first thing I did was find the mass, but I'm not sure if it would help at all

I did V=4/3 π r^3

and then multiplied by 29/360 to find the volume of the wedge and the multiplied by the density.


Also, just thought of this now:

r = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^1/2

could I differentiate the volume equation to find dV in terms of r and dr (4 pi r^2 dr)
and substitute in the above expression for r and just tack on dx dy and dz? SOrry if that breaks all rules of physics
 

Attachments

  • prob08-01.gif
    prob08-01.gif
    5.5 KB · Views: 609
Physics news on Phys.org
dinospamoni said:
The first thing I did was find the mass, but I'm not sure if it would help at all

I did V=4/3 π r^3

and then multiplied by 29/360 to find the volume of the wedge and the multiplied by the density.
That does not help.
You can write dV = dx dy dz in cartesian coordinates. There are similar formulas for spherical coordinates and other coordinate systems.


could I differentiate the volume equation to find dV in terms of r and dr (4 pi r^2 dr)
y^2 + z^2 and similar expressions are not constant for constant r, this does not work. You will need more than 1 integral.

For I_zz, you can use the symmetry of the problem, if you know the moment of inertia of a ball.
 
After posting this I converted it to spherical coordinates and used triple integration and found the correct answers. Thanks though!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top