Finding the moments of a distribution

blalien
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is to find the moments E(X^k) of f_x(x) = (\theta+1)(1-x)^\theta, 0 < x < 1, \theta > -1

Homework Equations


E(X^k)=\int_0^1 x^k (\theta+1)(1-x)^\theta dx
According to Mathematica, the solution is \frac{\Gamma(1+k)\Gamma(2+\theta)}{\Gamma(2+k+ \theta )}. I have no idea how to solve this integral by hand, however.

The Attempt at a Solution


If we let W = -\log(1-x), then the distribution for W is f_w(w) = (\theta+1)e^{-(\theta+1)w}, which is just the exponential distribution. The moments are E(W^k) = \frac{\Gamma(k+1)}{(1+\theta)^k}. The question is, if we know the relation between x and w and we know the moments for w, is it possible to find the moments for x? Or is there another way to solve this integral?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blalien said:

Homework Statement


The problem is to find the moments E(X^k) of f_x(x) = (\theta+1)(1-x)^\theta, 0 < x < 1, \theta > -1

Homework Equations


E(X^k)=\int_0^1 x^k (\theta+1)(1-x)^\theta dx
According to Mathematica, the solution is \frac{\Gamma(1+k)\Gamma(2+\theta)}{\Gamma(2+k+ \theta )}. I have no idea how to solve this integral by hand, however.

The Attempt at a Solution


If we let W = -\log(1-x), then the distribution for W is f_w(w) = (\theta+1)e^{-(\theta+1)w}, which is just the exponential distribution. The moments are E(W^k) = \frac{\Gamma(k+1)}{(1+\theta)^k}. The question is, if we know the relation between x and w and we know the moments for w, is it possible to find the moments for x? Or is there another way to solve this integral?

Thanks in advance!

You don't need to use Mathematica to get the value of E*W^k); it is expressible in terms of the Beta function, which is, in turn, expressible in terms of the Gamma function. The way you could do it manually is to "recognize" the Beta integral, then use standard theorems relating Beta to Gamma. Of course, if you are not familiar with the Beta integral, this will seem mysterious.

RGV
 
That's it, thanks. I don't know how we were ever supposed to solve this without knowing the beta function.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top