Finding the Pivot Point of a Chassis: Need Help!

AI Thread Summary
To find the pivot point of a chassis with fixed weights, calculate the total torque by summing the individual torques of each weight, which is determined by multiplying the weight by its distance from a reference point. The equation for total torque must equal zero for balance, allowing for the solution of the pivot point. The vertical distance of the weights is irrelevant to the calculation, as only horizontal distances impact the torque. The calculated pivot point is 3.577 meters from the left side of the chassis. This method effectively determines the pivot point without needing additional vertical measurements.
MrAJMemphis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am having some real trouble with this, could anybody help, attached is a picture of a chassis with some weights on etc, i need to find out where the pivot point would be. i can't move any of the objects around, does anybody know how to do it?
 

Attachments

  • Moments.png
    Moments.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 440
Mathematics news on Phys.org


The torque (turning force) about any point at distance x from a mass is its weight times that distance: Wx. The total torque of a group of mass is the total of the torques for each one. In particular, if x is measured from the far left, the torque due to the first 6N weight is 6(x- .5), due to the next 10N weight, 10(x- 3), due to the next weight, 2(x- 10), and the last, 8(x- 5), so the total torque is
6(x- .5)+ 10(x- 3)+ 2(x- 10)+ 8(x- 5). in order that the this balance, the total torque must be 0. Set that equal to 0 and solve for x.

Note that, because the pivot applies a force vertically, only the horizontal distance is important. (Which is pretty much implied by the way to problem is given: they do not tell you the height of that "up" section on the right.)
 


So if the vertical was dimensioned would this change the any part of the equation?
 


No, it wouldn't. The only forces here are the weights which act only vertically. As far as the pivot point is concerned only horizontal distances matter. My point was that if the vertical distance were necessary, since it is not given, you would not be able to do the problem. The fact that the vertical distance is not given, in a "book" problem, is a hint that it is not necessary.
 


The answer i have got for that then is the pivot is 3.577M in from the left. cool, well that is a massive help, i can not tell you how much i appreciate it, thanks very much HallsofIvy :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top