Finding the potential V and electric field E

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential V and electric field E due to a line of charge with linear charge density λ. The correct expression for the potential is V(x,z) = kλ ∫ dx / ((x-x')^2+z^2) from -L to L, while the electric field requires consideration of its vector nature and is derived from the potential. The initial formula for the electric field presented was only valid for an infinitely long rod, and the correct approach involves using Coulomb's law and integrating with respect to the appropriate variable. Participants emphasized the importance of correctly identifying the limits of integration and the need for precise notation. The use of mathematical software like Mathematica was suggested for handling complex calculations.
Abdul.119
Messages
73
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the electric potential V and electric field E at the point P due to a line of linear charge density = λ
2dmdo1z.png

Homework Equations


24od669.png

E = (2kλ)/z

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I made these lines
34si5g3.jpg

If P is on the z axis, r' = x, but it's shifted, so r' = x-x', and r = z, so then | r - r' | = ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2
The dl' = λdx, and -L < x < L
So we use the equation V(r), where k and λ are constants, and integration is from -L to L
So V(z) = kλ ∫ dx / ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2 , from -L to L
Am I correct?

And as for the the E field, I think it's simply E = (2kλ)/z ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abdul.119 said:
Am I correct?

And as for the the E field, I think it's simply E = (2kλ)/z ?
Your work on the potential is correct. For the field, you need to consider using Gauss law, almost the same as the integral you did for the potential where you need to consider the vector nature of field. The formula for the field you came up with there holds only for infinitely long rod.
 
Abdul.119 said:
So V(z) = kλ ∫ dx / ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2 , from -L to L
Am I correct?
Almost. What is the variable you're integrating with respect to? and BTW it's V(x,z), not just V(z).

And as for the the E field, I think it's simply E = (2kλ)/z ?
No, it's obviously a function of x and z.
Once you calculated V(x,z) you can get the E field how?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Your work on the potential is correct. For the field, you need to consider using Gauss law, almost the same as the integral you did for the potential where you need to consider the vector nature of field. The formula for the field you came up with there holds only for infinitely long rod.
I don't see how Gauss's law applies here.
 
OMG, yes I made a reference mistake. I meant Coulomb's law, and the related integral over the rod's length.
 
rude man said:
Almost. What is the variable you're integrating with respect to? and BTW it's V(x,z), not just V(z).No, it's obviously a function of x and z.
Once you calculated V(x,z) you can get the E field how?

Integrate with respect to x, since the charges lie on the x axis

For the E field, I believe I should use dE = (kλdx z) / r^3 , and in our case the r = ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2
Or E = -del V
 
Last edited:
Abdul.119 said:
Integrate with respect to x, since the charges lie on the x axis
The charges are on the x' axis. Your answer had better include x, right? which won't happen if you integrate with respect to x, letting x = +L and -L as limits of integration. This might have been a typo on your part; the answer is the same other than winding up with V(x',z) instead of V(x,z).
For the E field, I believe I should use dE = (kλdx z) / r^3 , and in our case the r = ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2
Or E = -del V
E is a vector, so your first expression can't be right.
I do suggest the second one, though ...
Be prepared for some messy math, I suggest going to math software if you have access to it.
 
rude man said:
The charges are on the x' axis. Your answer had better include x, right? which won't happen if you integrate with respect to x, letting x = +L and -L as limits of integration. This might have been a typo on your part; the answer is the same other than winding up with V(x',z) instead of V(x,z).
E is a vector, so your first expression can't be right.
I do suggest the second one, though ...
Be prepared for some messy math, I suggest going to math software if you have access to it.

Yeah I will use mathematica to solve these. And thanks for clearing it up, I was a little confused on the integral, got it now. :)
 
Back
Top