Finding the value of k (spring constant)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the spring constant (k) for a spring that has been stretched 1.4m and requires 100J of work to stretch an additional 1.5m. The engineer correctly applies the work-energy principle and the spring force equations, ultimately determining that k equals 31 N/m. The confusion arises from the relationship between work done and potential energy stored in the spring, which are equivalent under ideal conditions. The final calculation confirms that the spring constant is indeed 31 N/m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring force equations
  • Familiarity with work-energy principles in physics
  • Knowledge of potential energy equations for springs
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Hooke's Law and its applications in mechanics
  • Study the work-energy theorem in the context of elastic potential energy
  • Explore advanced topics in spring dynamics and oscillations
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple extensions of springs
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of springs and energy conservation principles.

p0ps1c1e
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
During a test experiment, the engineer finds an ideal very light spring has already been stretched 1.4m from its original length. He also finds that he needs to perform 100J of work to further stretch this spring an additional 1.5m. What is the value of the spring constant for this spring?

Homework Equations



W = F*d

F = -kx

So I wrote out that F1 = -kx to stretch the spring the initial 1.4m and then to stretch it the additional 1.5m it would take:

F2 +F1 = -2.9*k

I also wrote out:

F1 = -1.5k

Then I used 100 = F2*1.5

so F2 = 66.67 although I'm not sure if you can use this equation for a spring

Then 66.67 -1.5k = -2.9k and I tried solving for k but that didn't work so I'm not sure what else to try.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p0ps1c1e said:
Then I used 100 = F2*1.5
There are two problems with that approach. First, your F2 is the additional force to get the extra 1.5m extension, but while extending it that 1.5m the total force applied is between F1and F1+F2. Therefore F1is an important part of the work done.
Secondly, the force only reaches F1+F2 at full extension, so neither can you write 100 = (F1+F2)*1.5.

In terms of k, what work was done to stretch it 1.4m? What total work was done to stretch it 1.4+1.5m?
 
So W1 = 1/2k*(1.4)^2 = 0.98k
W2 = 100
WorkTotal = 1/2k(2.9)^2 = 4.205k

Then I put it together 4.205k = 0.98k + 100J

so k = 31 N/M ?

Also, I thought 1/2kx^2 was for potential energy of a spring. So I'm kind of confused about the difference between the two now
 
p0ps1c1e said:
so k = 31 N/M ?
Looks right.
p0ps1c1e said:
I thought 1/2kx^2 was for potential energy of a spring.
The work done to stretch a spring (from slack) equals the potential energy stored in the spring (assuming no losses). Where's the confusion?
 
Thanks. I guess I just need to review this chapter some more
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K