Finding the Volume of a Rotation About the x and y Axis

Habosh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi
this is my first post,and I hope i get the help I need;)
equation of curve 2y^2=x^3 find the volume of the solid formed by the complete rotation about the y-axis of the region bounded by the curve the y azis and the line with the equation y=2 which lies in the first quadrant,*done this*
npw i need help in second part of the question
find also the volume formed when the region is rotated completely about the x axis
I also have a question would anyone help me and explain what shall we do if the rotation was not 360 about the x axis,but was 180
thanx in advance:D
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rotating about the x-axis is mathematically equivalent to swapping x and y in the relation given then rotating about the y-axis so that whatever method you used in the first problem should work for the second problem.

Also, rotating halfway will give you half the volume of a full rotation.
 
well that is what driving me crazy,because in the second one I tried to make the equation with the y as a subject then squared it and substituted with 2 but it didn't work the answer was wrong:(
 
suggestion: curiosity is more powerful an attraction than academic pity. try stating the problem next time in the title. your current title has been used a lot before, and to me personally is often reason enough to ignore the post.
 
hehe:Dok then i will next time i'll post a thread with the title I have a phsycic powers is a math fourm:p that will surely attract some attention
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top