Finding the width of a diffraction slit

AI Thread Summary
To find the width of a diffraction slit that is seven times larger than the wavelength for various electromagnetic waves, the wavelength can be calculated using the formula λ = c/f, where c is the speed of light. For a radio wave at 100 MHz, the slit width would be 7 times the calculated wavelength. Similarly, for a 2.0 GHz cell phone signal, red light at 5e14 Hz, and X-rays at approximately 4e20 Hz, the same method applies. The initial confusion stems from misunderstanding the relationship between frequency and wavelength rather than the concept of diffraction itself. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
theskyisgreen
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Single-slit diffraction can be observed with any type of electromagnetic wave (not just light). Suppose you want to make a diffraction slit whose width is seven times larger than the wavelength for the following cases. How wide would the slit be?

(a) A radio wave for your favorite FM station (f = 100 MHz)


(b) The waves that carry your cell phone signals (f = 2.0 GHz)


(c) Red light (f = 5e14 Hz)


(d) The X-rays used in your dentist's office (f ≈ 4e20Hz)



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I honestly have no idea where to begin with this.
I do know that the answer to a) is 7*3.. but I don't know why?
If anyone can point me in the right direction it would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relationship between frequency and wavelength is

\lambda=\frac{c}{f}

where c is the speed of light. The problem has nothing to do with diffraction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top