Finding the x-component of a force using Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the x-component of the force between two point charges using Coulomb's Law. Initially, the force exerted by charge q1 on q2 was calculated to be -17.64N when q2 was positioned along the x-axis. After moving q2 2.4 cm in the positive y-direction, the new force was calculated as -16.37N, but the x-component was incorrectly derived using a 45-degree angle assumption. Upon clarification, it was recognized that the angle was not necessarily 45 degrees, leading to confusion in the calculations. The importance of accurately determining the angle based on the new position of q2 was emphasized for correct force component calculations.
cherrymilk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(1) A point charge q1 = -2.9 μC is located at the origin of a co-ordinate system. Another point charge q2 = 5 μC is located along the x-axis at a distance x2 = 8.6 cm from q1.

The answer to this was -17.64N.

(2) Charge q2 is now displaced a distance y2 = 2.4 cm in the positive y-direction. What is the new value for the x-component of the force that q1 exerts on q2?

Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law: F = k (q1q2)/(r^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


Seeing that q2's position had changed, I calculated the new force exerted using Coulomb's Law. I used 9*10^9 for k, and using the Pythagorean theorem, I calculated the new distance between the charges, which I got to be 0.089. After using Coulomb's Law, I got an answer of -16.37N. To find the x-component, I multiplied this value by cos(45), giving me a final answer of -11.58. This, however, is apparently incorrect and I'm confused as to why.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you chose 45 degrees as the angle?
 
OtherWindow said:
Why did you chose 45 degrees as the angle?

Ah, I see what I did wrong. I just assumed that because they had drawn the line they way they did in the figure, the angle was 45 degrees. Silly mistake, thanks for that!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top