Finding time period and minimum length of threads

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the optimal length of threads for an iron rod to achieve the minimum swinging period. The time period of oscillation is expressed as T=2π√(l'/g), where l' is the distance from the center of mass to the hinge. A key point raised is the necessity to consider the moment of inertia, as the mass distribution affects the period. The initial approach did not yield the correct results until this factor was acknowledged. Ultimately, recognizing the importance of the moment of inertia resolved the issue.
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


(see attachment)
An iron rod of length L is hung at a common point with threads of length \ell which are attached to the two ends of the rod. The rod is displaced a bit in the plane of the threads. What is the length of the threads if the period of the swinging of the rod is the least, and what is this period?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The CM of the rod will perform oscillations similar to a pendulum. Therefore, the time period of oscillation is:
T=2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{l'}{g}}
where l' is the distance of the CM of rod from the hinged point.
l'=\sqrt{l^2-\frac{L^2}{4}}
Substituting this relation in the previous equation and differentiating the result to find the minimum time period doesn't give me the right answer.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 9a715fb33559555ca03369cc9.gif
    9a715fb33559555ca03369cc9.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 491
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You would have this period if the entire mass were concentrated in the middle of the rod. Which is not the case, so you have to take the moment of inertia into account.
 
voko said:
You would have this period if the entire mass were concentrated in the middle of the rod. Which is not the case, so you have to take the moment of inertia into account.

Ah, completely forgot about it. Thanks a lot voko! That solved the problem. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top