Finding Velocity of a bullet using springs and hanging masses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a ballistic spring system to measure bullet velocity using a suspended spring and a hanging mass. The initial approach involves using Newton's second law and energy conservation principles, but there are concerns about the accuracy of these methods due to energy loss from friction when the bullet embeds in the block. Participants suggest that conservation of momentum should be applied to analyze the collision instead, as it provides a more reliable way to calculate the bullet's speed and kinetic energy after impact. Clarifications on variables like the distance y and the energy stored in the spring post-collision are also discussed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for energy losses in the system.
viciousp
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You have been asked to design a "ballistic spring system" to measure the speed of bullets. A spring whose spring constant is k is suspended from the ceiling. A block of mass M hangs from the spring. A bullet of mass m is fired vertically upward into the bottom of the block. The spring's maximum compression d is measured.

Homework Equations


KEi + PEi = KEf +PEf
F= -kx

The Attempt at a Solution



I first used Newtons second law to find the the distance x the string is stretched, so:
Mg=k(x-d)
x= (Mg/k)+d

Then I used the energy law like so:
1/2(mb(Vb)2 +Mgy + 1/2(k)(x2) = Mg(y+d)

solving for Vb I get:

sqrt[(2Mgd-(k(d+Mg/k)^2))/m]

But I am pretty sure this is wrong, can someone help me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't fully understand this
1/2(mb(Vb)2 +Mgy + 1/2(k)(x2) = Mg(y+d)
The distance y is not clear to me.
It seems to me that it should be
energy before = energy after
½mv² + ½kx² = Mgy + ½k(y-x)²
assuming that y is the amount M moves upward when the bullet hits
 
I used y as the height from the block to the ground
 
Okay, that makes sense but your formula does not include the energy stored in the spring after the collision.

Actually, I'm worried about the whole approach. The bullet will embed itself in the block, losing lots of energy to friction. We have no way to estimate this loss of energy so we can't use conservation of energy.

Recommend you use conservation of momentum in the collision of the bullet with the block. That should give you the speed and kinetic energy the bullet/block after the collision.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top