Finding Velocity of Positive ion with Volts given.

AI Thread Summary
To find the radius of an ion's path in a magnetic field after being accelerated through a potential difference of 250 V, the relevant equation is radius = (mass x velocity) / (charge x B). The potential energy (PE) is calculated using PE = Volts x charge, which leads to the determination of velocity. The user initially miscalculated velocity but later confirmed the correct radius of 1.77 cm. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding potential difference in relation to energy. Ultimately, the solution was clarified and confirmed with assistance.
dkr1207
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An ion is accelerated through potential diff. of 250 V, directly perpendicular to mag. field.
Find radius of the path of the ion in the field.

Given:
mass (m)=2.5 x 10^-26
charge(q)= 1.6 x 10^-19
Volts= 250 V
Mag. Field (B) = 0.50 T

Homework Equations



radius= (mass x VELOCITY)/ (charge x B)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the answer is 1.77 cm for the radius, but i need to prove how, but i can't seem to find an equation or reason to use Volts to get Velocity in the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the definition of "potential difference"? Thinking about that should help you figure out how to use the number of volts. Hint: energy.
 
Pe

First i find PE with:

PE=Volts x charge

plug in to:

velocity=[(-2/mass) x PE]^(1/2)

seems right...

PE= 250V / 1.6 x 10^-19 C = 1.56 x 10^21 J

plug in:
and you get velocity at 3.54 x 10^23 cm/s

but when you use that number in the final radius equation, its not = to 1.77 cm (and i know that's right)
 
First i find PE with:

PE=Volts x charge

plug in to:

velocity=[(-2/mass) x PE]^(1/2)

seems right...

PE= 250V / 1.6 x 10^-19 C = 1.56 x 10^21 J

plug in:
and you get velocity at 3.54 x 10^23 cm/s

but when you use that number in the final radius equation, its not = to 1.77 cm (and i know that's right)
 
nvm... its good now, thanks for the help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top