Finding Weight on Inclined Plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the weight components of an object on an inclined plane using free-body diagrams. The correct equations for the weight components are established as W parallel = mgsin(theta) and W perpendicular = mgcos(theta), where theta is the angle of inclination. A participant expresses difficulty in visualizing how to derive these components geometrically using trigonometric functions. Clarifications are provided regarding the relationship between the angle of inclination and the weight components, especially in scenarios with no incline or a vertical incline. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the importance of correctly identifying angles in the diagrams for accurate calculations.
tod88
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
EDIT: I think I just figured it out...could you check out the picture I added and see if my reasoning is right?

Thanks!

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/618/20080716103213jm3.png

------------
I'm working on free-body diagrams and I'm having trouble finding the components of the weight of an object on an inclined plane. I know that if you take the +x axis to be the plane and the +y axis to be the direction of the normal force that the weight components are:

W parallel = mgsin(theta)
W perpendicular = mgcos(theta)

where theta is the angle of inclination

My problem is that I have trouble "seeing" geometrically how to actually FIND the components using trig functions. Is the weight -always- going to be determined by these two equations if I use the coordinate system that I mentioned?

Sorry if this is too basic a question! I just wanted to see the "why" behind these equations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your angles are shown incorrectly. What you have shown as (90- A) is actually A, and vice versa. Carefully do the geometry first, then the trig. You will find that the weight component parallel to the incline is mgsinA, and the weight component perpendicular to the incline is mg cosA.
 
Hi tod88,

tod88 said:
EDIT: I think I just figured it out...could you check out the picture I added and see if my reasoning is right?

Thanks!

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/618/20080716103213jm3.png

------------
I'm working on free-body diagrams and I'm having trouble finding the components of the weight of an object on an inclined plane. I know that if you take the +x axis to be the plane and the +y axis to be the direction of the normal force that the weight components are:

W parallel = mgsin(theta)
W perpendicular = mgcos(theta)

where theta is the angle of inclination

My problem is that I have trouble "seeing" geometrically how to actually FIND the components using trig functions. Is the weight -always- going to be determined by these two equations if I use the coordinate system that I mentioned?

Sorry if this is too basic a question! I just wanted to see the "why" behind these equations.

I notice you have one set of equations in the diagram, and a different set in the post itself. (In your picture, you say the cosine function is associated with the parallel component, and in the post itself you say the cosine function goes with the perpendicular component.)

When the box is just on level, flat ground, that corresponds to your angle of inclination A (or \theta) being zero degrees. In that situation, is the perpendicular or parallel component of the weight equal to zero? (parallel or perpendicular to the ground) Which set (in the picture or in the post) of equations agrees with that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah...that makes sense. So whenever there's no incline, all the weight is perpendicular (mg)(cos(0)) = mg and whenever the incline is 90˚, all the weight is parallel (mg)(sin(90˚) = mg and the object is in free-fall.

And thanks for the comment on my diagram too...I see where I messed up the angles. I think I understand now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top