Finding work by Force over Position graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a 5 kg object moving from 0.5 to 2.0 meters while considering friction. The initial work done by the force was calculated as 27.5 joules, while the work done against friction was determined to be -14.715 joules, leading to a net work of 12.785 joules. However, there was confusion regarding the correct approach to account for friction, with a suggestion that the friction force should be added rather than subtracted. Additionally, there were questions about the significance of the graph's section from 0 to 0.5 meters and whether the object should be considered starting from rest at that position. Clarifications on units and calculations were also discussed to ensure accuracy in determining the final speed of the object.
Jrlinton
Messages
133
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


physic.jpg
An object of 5 kg is acted on by a force and moved from 0.5 to 2.0m.
How much work does the force do?
As the object moved, friction with a coefficient of 0.2 also acted upon it. What is its final speed if it started at rest?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So the work done from 0.5m to 2.0 m was easy enought to find as I just used the graph to find the area between the data and the x-axis coming up with 27.5J

I calculated the work of friction (-u*m*g*d) -0.2*5kg*9.81m/s/s*1.5m= -14.715 J. I subtracted this from the 27.5 joules found earlier to get 12.785 J. Set 12.785=0.5*m*v^2=(0.5)(5kg)(v^2) and found v to be 2.26 m/s. This was incorrect...[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some observations on what you wrote:

Your graph shows force as a function of time (from t=0 to t=2sec) - you have written "s" and "sec" for units on that axis.

If you subtract -14.715J from 27.5J, then you get 42.215J

The friction force is a constant 9.8N ... how do you know your calculation is incorrect (ie. if computer mediated, maybe you were supposed to use 10N/kg for gravity).
 
I apologize, the units should be meters. The graph is given from 0m to 2m but the work is the be calculated from 0.5m to 2m. The work of the friction, as it opposes the work of force F, should be added, I stated that i subtracted meaning the magnitude of the fictional work.
 
Any idea what the significance is of the section of the graph from 0 to .5m? Was that for another part of the question? I ask in case for the second part you are supposed to take the object as starting from rest at position 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Simon Bridge
Second above - looking at your graph, where did the object start?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top