Finite Groups and Three Dimensional Pseudo Real Representations: An Exploration

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rkrsnan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Representation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of finite groups that possess three-dimensional pseudo real representations, with participants exploring definitions and implications related to these representations. The conversation includes theoretical aspects of representation theory, particularly focusing on the Frobenius–Schur indicator and the properties of bilinear forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests an example of a finite group with a three-dimensional pseudo real representation, noting their inability to find such examples and questioning the existence of a theorem that might state it does not exist.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the term "pseudo" real representation.
  • A participant clarifies that they refer to a complex representation with real characters, also known as a quaternionic representation, and mentions the significance of the Frobenius–Schur indicator being -1.
  • It is suggested that a three-dimensional vector space cannot support a nondegenerate skew symmetric bilinear form, which may explain the absence of three-dimensional pseudo real representations.
  • A participant points out that the Frobenius-Schur indicator result applies only to irreducible representations and confirms the correctness of the guess regarding the skew symmetric bilinear form.
  • Another participant acknowledges their focus on irreducible representations and expresses gratitude for the clarification regarding bilinear forms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions and properties discussed, particularly regarding the Frobenius–Schur indicator and the nature of bilinear forms. However, the existence of three-dimensional pseudo real representations remains unresolved, with no consensus on whether they can exist.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the properties of irreducible representations and the specific characteristics of bilinear forms in relation to dimensionality, which may limit the existence of certain representations.

rkrsnan
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Can you please give an example for a finite group with a three dimensional pseudo real representation? I can find examples of finite groups with 2, 6 and 8 dimensional pseudo real representations, but couldn't find any with a three dimensional pseudo real rep. Is there some theorem that states that it doesn't exist? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by a "pseudo" real representation?
 
My apologies for the confusing terminology. What I meant was a complex representation which has real characters. It is also called a quaternionic representation. I also understand that for a pseudo real representation the Frobenius–Schur indicator will be -1. From wikipedia: "It is −1 exactly when the irreducible representation has a skew symmetric invariant bilinear form. These are the representations whose character is real but that cannot be defined over the reals."

I am guessing that we can not make a skew symmetric invariant bilinear form using three dimensional vectors. That explains why I can't find a three dimensional pseudoreal representation.
 
Careful - notice that the result you quoted about the Frobenius-Schur indicator applies only to irreducible representations. Are you only interested in these? If this is the case, then your guess that there is no nondegenerate skew symmetric bilinear form on a 3-dimensional vector space is correct and answers your question. Indeed, it's not too hard to show that if a finite-dimensional vector space V admits a nondegenerate skew symmetric bilinear form, then dimV must be even.

One piece of the puzzle remains: you have to also show that the form you get from F-S is nondegenerate. This follows from the invariance of the form and the irreducibility of the representation.

If you need any help filling out any of the details, be sure to post back.
 
Yes, I am only concerned with irreducible representations. I didn't know about the subtlety of the degenerate/nondegenerate bilinear forms though. Thanks very much for the reply and the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K